User talk:Nymf

Boring.

Hello Nymph we love that you contribute to Wiki however it has come to my attention from your recent edit on Brad Pitt's page that you had made unconstructive edits and reverted edits that weren't yours without permission. It is for that reason that you are being blocked for 2 weeks from making edits. We would love for you to continue being a productive contributor to the Wiki community as soon as 2 weeks are over. We highly advise that you contact the editor before making any reverts, because doing otherwise is rude.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Two weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bgwhite (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

== For what it's worth, I think details like this, used sporadically, make article subjects more human. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 19:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Your revert at Cate Blanchett

The Best Picture Oscar is an award for the film's overall merits and an actor will always affect a film's quality. It is clear that a film such as "Elizabeth" would not have gotten close to the nomination if it hadn't been for the acclaim for the central performance. Thusly, I believe placing under parenthesis what Best Picture nominees an actor/actress has been in a) helps a reader who is searching for films to watch from the Actor/Actress b) is an appropriate merit-based assessment of his/her work Simon824 (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)