Jump to content

Talk:Zipper storage bag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 62.78.251.108 (talk) at 11:12, 7 April 2014 (Contradicts the Ziploc page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconTechnology Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconPolymers (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Patent Information

The information on this page about the patent is inaccurate. The inventor named, Robert W. Vergobbi, doesn't seem to have any direct ties to the zipper storage bag. The most related patent by Mr. Vergobbi I could find is his patent on the reinforced bag (US patent 2,678,768). The primary use of the aforementioned invention is to provide a plastic bag to display contents while staying upright in the 'most satisfactory' position. --Eviltoylet (talk) 22:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

similar without zipper

So what is the name of the somewhat similar product which is sealed and opened just by pushing the closing sides together? The article states that Minigrip licensed the zipper ones, but I associate the name Minigrip with the zipperless ones.
Searching Minigrip I found Ziploc and this article, and nothing on those articles says anything about the zipperless bag. 82.141.67.208 (talk) 07:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contradicts the Ziploc page

The Ziploc page says the Minigrip bags were invented by a Japanese company and doesn't mention this Vergobbi guy at all... So how about confirming which page has the correct information and using the same for both? 62.78.251.108 (talk) 11:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]