User talk:Balkanian`s word

; Archives
	Archive 1; Archive 2;

Hi Balkanian`s word, I'm working on a page right now in my sandbox and was wondering if you could give me some tips or any advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JAYRAJ123 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arvanites-great primeries

[1] [2] [3] [4]

Hello

Hello, By looking at your profile page I noticed that you like flags...I do too. I like your flag a lot. -monocletophat123

File:Flag of the Principality of Arber.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Principality of Arber.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Alexikoua (talk) 18:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IP 95.107.208.205

Hi Balkanian, I don't want to template you because I know you. Using 95.107.208.205 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for WP:CANVASSING looks as if you are trying to avoid WP:SCRUTINY. You know both of these are bad things, so please stop doing them. Take care. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 22:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget WP:3RR on Albania

Per WP:3RR, no more edit-warring on Albania please. I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. Thanks. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 00:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you see wikipedia as a battlefield: your recent record is a compination of canvassing, aggresive speech, threats in talkpages, instant reverting and the epitomy: 8 reverts in 3 days in one article. Hope you have a convincing explanation about it.Alexikoua (talk) 11:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have fully answered your questions in talk:Albania (i.e. an organization under the EU framework clearly reported irregularities of this procedure). In case you continue edit-warring you leave me no choice to report ninja activity.Alexikoua (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

== April 2014 ==

Hi Balkanian. I think we are having a problem here because your recent editing history at Albania shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. As you know, being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring— even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You haven't been blocked since 2009. That's encouraging. But to avoid the chance of being blocked, after so many block-free years, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You have been edit-warring against multiple users for days. Sorry but I had to give you a more complete and formal warning to remind you of the exact rules. I hope that I will not have to file a 3RR report since I know you for a long time and I value your work. Please seek dispute resolution because edit-wars are not the answer in a collaborative environment such as Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 20:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP is not anymore a colaborative enviroment. It is clear that WP:IDONTLIKEIT has became a nonsense policy, as if you are a bunch of people who do not like something true, you may "bit" the oponent, who has arguments. You included yourself in that list, by reverting and commenting in a "I dont like that" way. I tried in Administrators Noticeboard, and nobody bothers to answer. So what should I do, according to you?Balkanian`s word (talk) 07:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try to discuss this some more on the talkpage. I have a few ideas. If that fails, perhaps we can try an RfC or go to RSN. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 07:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And no more talk about extreme parties. Let's try to keep this discussion at a higher level please. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 07:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would really like that, but please help me, by not doing politics on WP. Using the POV-ish wording "questioned census", "unreliable census", etc., it just resembles to the way Golden Dawn and Omonoia have spoken. Please do not use the terms they use in here, it is not the place. I am willing to discuss in a higher level; but we all should be.Balkanian`s word (talk) 07:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]