Talk:Herd

Mammals Start‑class High‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Do not move to wiktionary

Do not move to wiktionary, a herd or flock has an extremely important role to play in animal behaviour and can be analysed as such, it is more than a word. Dunc|☺ 11:46, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I agree with Duncharris. Also, kudos to Pgreenfinch! S/he did a superb job of reorganizing the Herd page from an "almost a wiktionary sort of entry" to a solid foundation for a true wikipedia page on the term "herd." Good on you.

Glad I could help and thanks for your kind appreciation --Pgreenfinch 13:03, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

A 'flock' of geese?

In the caption to the first picture, it says 'a flock of geese'. However, isn't the plural noun for geese a 'gaggle'? I am changing it, but would appreciate feedback, rather than starting an edit war. Daniel (☎) 15:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I learned somewhere is that a flock of geese in the air can be called a "skein", and a flock on the ground or in the water can be called a "gaggle". Thus your change is correct. However, I agree with the people who say that most such collective nouns are fanciful and there's no real need to go beyond "herd", "flock", "pack", "school" or "shoal", "colony", "swarm", and maybe "covey" and "troop" and "pod" and "pride". So I wouldn't have changed "flock of geese", but I'm not going to change "gaggle of geese" either. —JerryFriedman 18:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three (or more?) Wikipedia articles on herding?

I just added herd behavior and herding instinct to the See also section, as they are both clearly related Wikipedia articles. In my view, we need to shrink these three articles (those two plus this one on just plain herd) into no more than two articles. There is already a discussion going on at Talk:Herd behavior on the possibilty of a merge. I weighed in on that issue over there. However, since I only recently became aware of this WP article herd, it looks like we should be looking at all three when considering how to clean up the group of them. Input from others would be helpful. How ought we organize the entire group? N2e 04:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the three articles you mention, I see how thorny the question is. It seems to me that the difficulty comes mostly in trying to sort out human herding from herding among animals in general. So, what if herd behavior and herding instinct were joined as one article under "Human herding", since that's what those articles are mostly about anyway? This way you could leave the herd article as is, since it's mostly about animal herding.

Rgfolsom 14:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a good idea to have a specific Human herding article which would reunite most of the texts in herd behavior and herding instinct. --Pgreenfinch 22:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems there is now a consensus on how these three articles ought to shake out: one article on human herding, and one (this one) on just plain [[herd] over in the Talk:Herd behavior page. N2e 01:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do animals herd? section, expert attention requested

The statement "It is generally believed that the most important protective factor is risk dilution" is unsourced and to me it doesn't make sense. A hungry cheetah is going to eat just an many antelope in a herd as scattered individuals. In fact, probably more because the antelope are gathered together in a buffet instead of hiding. I found a more reasonable explanation at [1] but this isn't a reliable source. This isn't my area of expertise, which is why I'm trying to find the answer here, and it would be appreciated if someone who knows this subject could fix the section.RDBury (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had the same thought. In a herd the probability of being caught by a predator during a confrontation with a predator is lower but the number of confrontations is higher by exactly the inverse factor, unless of course there are secondary effects such as the herd coordinating defense or predators getting confused by, for example, the movement of a large number of striped zebras or darting fish. So I'm removing that sentence. 89.99.122.33 (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]