Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meredith Averill (2nd nomination)
Appearance
AfDs for this article:
- Meredith Averill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage in reliable sources other than passing mentions. No indications of any awards or anything else that would elevate her to WP:GNG or WP:FILMMAKER. John from Idegon (talk) 22:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. Variety called her a "TV writer to watch" in their top ten list. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Passing mentions such as the one mentioned above are all you can find on her. That means she is not notable. John from Idegon (talk) 22:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. She created a series for CW, a minor network, but she has since become primary staff on a highly successful major network series -- her career trajectory alone, based on verifiable credentials, makes her notable. You aren't likely to see a lot of press for her while she is on staff of The Good Wife because only the show runners [in this case, Robert and Michelle King] are customarily permitted to discuss the show's creative aspects. Bustter (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2014 (UTC)