Jump to content

Son of Heaven

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 123.243.215.92 (talk) at 07:31, 19 May 2014 (Just added a link to "Mandate of Heaven"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Son of Heaven was a title of the Qianlong Emperor

The Son of Heaven (Chinese and Japanese: 天子; pinyin: Tiānzǐ; ) is an imperial title of East Asian monarchs founded on the Mandate of Heaven. The Son of Heaven is a universal emperor who rules tianxia comprising "all under heaven".[1] The title was not interpreted literally except in Japan, and the monarch is a mortal chosen by Heaven, not its actual descendant.[2]

History

The title Son of Heaven comes from the Mandate of Heaven, created by the monarchs of the Zhou dynasty to justify deposing the Shang dynasty. They declared that Heaven had revoked the mandate from the Shang and given it to the Zhou in retaliation for their corruption and misrule. Heaven bestowed the mandate to whoever was best fit to rule. The title held the emperor responsible for the prosperity and security of his people through the threat of losing the mandate.[2]

The Emperor of Japan ruled as a divine descendant of the sun goddess Amaterasu

The Japanese title tenshi (天子) was adopted by the Emperor of Japan during the Asuka period.[3] Japan sent diplomatic missions to China, then under the rule of the Sui dynasty, forming cultural and commercial ties.[4] The Yamato state modeled their government after the Confucian imperial bureaucracy. A mission in 607 delivered a message that greeted the Sui emperor by saying that "the Son of Heaven in the land where the sun rises... to the Son of Heaven in the land where the sun sets."[3] The Japanese title was less conditional than its Chinese counterpart. There was no divine mandate that punished the emperor for failing to rule justly. The right to rule of the Japanese emperor, descended from the sun goddess Amaterasu, was absolute.[5]

The Vietnamese title Thiên-tử was more similar to the Chinese Son of Heaven. A divine mandate gave the Vietnamese emperor the right to rule, but it was based on his ability to govern and not his lineage.[6] The adoption in Vietnam of a Confucian bureaucracy ruled by a Son of Heaven led to the creation of a Vietnamese tributary system in Southeast Asia modeled on the Chinese Sinocentric system in East Asia.[7]

The Son of Heaven was often one of several titles adopted by East Asian monarchs. Emperor Taizong of the Tang dynasty held the Chinese Son of Heaven title and the Central Asian title of Heavenly Great Khan, which he gained after defeating the Tujue.[8] Japanese monarchs employed the title of tenno (天皇), a name that also appeals to the emperor's connection to heaven.[9]

Citations

  1. ^ Ebrey 2010, p. 179.
  2. ^ a b Dull 1990, p. 59.
  3. ^ a b Huffman 2010, p. 15.
  4. ^ Inoue 1993, p. 182.
  5. ^ Beasley 1999, p. 29.
  6. ^ Woodside 1971, p. 9.
  7. ^ Woodside 1971, pp. 234–237.
  8. ^ Twitchett 2000, p. 124.
  9. ^ Ooms 2009, pp. 154–156.

Bibliography

  • Beasley, William (1999). "The Making of a Monarchy". The Japanese Experience: A Short History of Japan. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-22560-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Dull, Jack (1990). "The Evolution of Government in China". Heritage of China: Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06441-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (2010) [1996]. The Cambridge Illustrated History of China (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-12433-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Huffman, James (2010). Japan in World History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-979884-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Inoue, Mitsusada (1993). "The Century of Reform". The Cambridge History of Japan. Cambridge University Press. pp. 163–220. ISBN 978-0-521-22352-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Ooms, Herman (2009). Imperial Politics and Symbolics in Ancient Japan: The Tenmu Dynasty, 650-800. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-3235-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Twitchett, Denis (2000). H. J. Van Derven (ed.). Warfare in Chinese History. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-11774-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Woodside, Alexander (1971). Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Vietnamese and Chinese Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-93721-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)