Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Ripened Warm Tomato Party (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
- Sun Ripened Warm Tomato Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable joke party. JDDJS (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- keep What are the criteria for notability of a joke political party? This party got just as much newspaper notice as most such parties ever get — a few mentions during each election campaign, as part of the lighter side of the campaign, or when they pull a particularly interesting stunt. But who has access to newspaper archives from the '80s to find the exact article references? That's not a reason to delete the article and pretend the party didn't exist or wasn't noted. The world didn't begin with the creation of online newspaper archives. -- 64.131.244.143 (talk) 23:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I would be arguing keep anyway, but this nomination has not even attempted to address the issues from the previous AfD (which, yes, was almost ten years ago, but still raises valid points). This one, which still has a degree of name recognition, has dedicated coverage, and continues to have a degree of significance. Frickeg (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Frickeg (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 22 May 2014 (UTC)