User talk:Sedamjedan

Userfied article

Welcome. As we discussed on my talk page, I have restored the deleted article to your user space at User:Sedamjedan/Amanda Eliasch. I have also restored the associated talk page to User talk:Sedamjedan/Amanda Eliasch because it contains a description of some concerns that should be addressed before re-submitting the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I can certainly see why it was deleted, but that's why we love Wikipedia. Spontaneous evolution and improvement.

follow up

I see that it has been restored in essentially identical form via articles for submission. This is not acceptable. As reviewing administrator, I have deleted that submission--the draft version remains for the time being in your user space. Do not submit it again without improvement DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Major cleanup

Finally found some time to clean up all the mess and put it in order. Sedamjedan (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 16:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

follow up

Hi Tutelary, the page was clean and fully referenced, the subject achieved quite many things and is a good artist, if we compare other living artists on Wikipedia, I believe this is harsh reaction without any written argument why is it G11. Please if you can do me a favor and enlight this beginner. :-) Sedamjedan (talk)