Talk:Cruelty
Philosophy: Ethics Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Law Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Is this really suitable for wikipedia?
In my eyes, it's more of a wiktionary article. 217.60.43.5 06:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
It is suitable, but could be developed into discussion of philosophical cruelty, re: Nietzsche, Artaud, etc.
Needs a proper definition. I believe that most people use the word cruel to imply the infliction of purposeful suffering. Being indiffrent to what someone else believes to be cruel to too subjective. Even though it is a subjective idea.86.41.103.12 (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
cruel
a cruel is also a mythival creature found in c.s.lewis's chronicles of nirnia. it is for the most part transparent, use a subsonic scream to attack it's enemies, and is a follower of the white witch.
Leuricy
Leuricy- antonym of cruelty definition= The utter absence of ill or hurtful intentions characterized by impartial love and/or hospitality. Usage: She became a saint because of the leuricy she showed towards others. Also can be an adjective (leuric). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cutlerowns19 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
"In consumer products" section
This reads like an add for Beauty without Cruelty. Its clearly cut and paste from a website, its not suitable at all.