Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HDGuard

HDGuard

Appears to be no more than an advertisement for the product. Parent company Eye4you is also being considered for deletion; both pages are primarily the work of the same user HumbleGod 06:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An advertisement is not allowed.--Tdxi an g 07:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as ad. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has anyone ever even heard of this software? The company is a small business that specialises in redistributing software developed by others. ~~I am unable to find any real info about them, and so their notability is dubious indeed.~~ Let me clarify this. I am able to verify their existence, but I was unable to verify that they have produced or distributed anything of note. --NMChico24 08:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, are you talking about 'Eye4you' the distributor, or 'Ramcke DatenTechnik GmbH' the developer? Kuru ^talk 19:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - The company I refer to is Eye4you. That is the company this article was associated with, as the same user who posted that article (since deleted) posted this one. --NMChico24 21:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Indeed, I am actually employed by the company eye4you, we do distribute HDGuard which in turn is somewhat of a competitor of Deep Freeze (Deep Freeze has little presence in Australia and Europe). I absolutely love wikipedia, and thought it may have been a good idea to post articles on our company which is well known throughout the Australian public/private education arena, however, after reading through the WP articles I do agree that both the HDGuard and eye4you articles should be removed. Notability doubts and corporate _influence_ are present, please delete this article. (Comment also posted on the Deep Freeze (software) AfD dispute.) Nathan.manzi 01:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]