User talk:Esperant
I reserve the right to reply to comments left here either on this page, or on your talk page, as I see fit.
 Archives |
|---|
|
Gangs
Hi I was wondering why the Birmingham section had been deleted in Uk gangs - is it possible to re-instate this? N --94.197.127.42 (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not a clue, sorry. esperant 16:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Esperant. While I can understand and respect your reasons for making this edit to Sexual Morality and the Law, I think re-directing the page is premature. Since the article does have some sources, I am not sure that it is entirely original research. I would recommend that you consult with relevant WikiProjects (such as WikiProject Philosophy or WikiProject Sexuality), before taking further action. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- There was nothing premature about my edit. It was carefully considered. The references in the article are all to the sole primary source that the article is about, though this primary source is here referenced in three different formats, giving the impression of more than one source. It's clear OR, albeit very erudite etc. There is no possibility this article will ever meet notability guidelines – it is about to an obscure radio broadcast, albeit with notable participants, about which not serious treatment has been written or is ever likely to be written. That is, there are no secondary sources here that could constitute the basis of a proper encyclopedia article. I do not have the time to become involved in wikiprojects, nor enter into a prolonged dispute about this. Since you seem to have reverted my edit on the basis that there are 'some sources', and I believe this belief to be erroneous, I will revert to me previous edit, though I do this in good faith, and will not engage in an edit war. esperant 21:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Snow (musician Page)
Hi there. A user named canadaolympic989 keeps deleting my addition of the Tokio Hot 100 charts (http://www.j-wave.co.jp/original/tokiohot100/) and the charts listed for Jamaica in the mongraph, Kevin O'Brien Chang and Wayne Chen, Reggae Routes: The Story of Jamaican music (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998), 211 for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_%28musician%29. He's also called me an "idiot." So, my question is, are charts from Jamaica and Japan not allowed to be included on Wikipedia? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whimedywhama (talk • contribs) 01:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have no idea about such things, sorry. esperant 10:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Imbecile, etc.
Hi there-- Do you have a specific issue with the article on Imbecile? I added more sources but did not change any of the language. What is it you consider original research? Also, while I am here, I was wondering what specific concerns you had with what seemed to be a fair summary of Sexual Morality and the Law? I think it's more useful to have a summary vs. nothing for those interested in a topic. What sort of summary would be acceptable to you? I feel that Foucault piece merits expansion. Jokestress (talk) 20:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. I fear we are very much at odds philosophically regarding this project, though I respect your position. I'd rather read a lengthy but imperfect summary than a perfect stub. I hope you don't mind if I draw you out on one point. While we have rules regarding synthesis to advance a novel position, we must by definition aggregate and synthesize in creating the sum of human knowledge. Can you direct me to an article here about a text, term, or concept which might stand as a template for an ideal article in your opinion? I'm not sure how one can gather information from a number of textbooks, overviews, or encyclopedias and not synthesize the material in some way. Otherwise it seems to me an article is just a random unorganized collection of citations. Isn't part of our job to organize material into a cohesive shape that reflects all points of view proportionally? Jokestress (talk) 03:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Education Program Fall 2012
Hi, Esperant!
I saw you had a userbox that says you're a professor at a university, and I thought you might be interested in participating in the Wikipedia Education Program for the coming term. If you're still teaching a class and would like your students to edit Wikipedia as an assignment, please email me at jmathewson@wikimedia.org to talk more about the program! Thanks! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Sack of Rome (410), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illyricum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Suggestion
Hello! I noticed you contributed to Middlesex University entry on Wikipedia. If you studied at that University, please consider including this userbox on your userpage. Simply paste {{Template:User Middlesex}} to your userpage. You will be added into this category Thank you. Invest in knowledge (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Esperant. I just noticed that a while ago you trimmed down the article about Foucauldian genealogy on the grounds that it has no potential to be more than a stub since there is no real secondary literature on this specific topic. Well, there is at least one reliable published source on the matter: Gary Gutting's "Michel Foucault" (2008). I am planning to restore parts of the article — the parts that can be backed up by secondary sources. Cheers. —Omnipaedista (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've replied to your message on my talk page. —Omnipaedista (talk) 04:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Armed With Anger Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No inherent notability, as per WP:ORGIN
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Swinburne University and advertorial cruft
Hi Esperant.
Thank you very much for your efforts at cleaning up advertorial material from the Swinburne University of Technology article: you improved the article by removing a significant amount of cruft. Today, I removed another 20 kilobytes of cruft. I would like to suggest an additional tip or two, if I might.
If a sentence seems like it may or may not be advertising, assume it's advertising. :) Some example sentences:
- "Students can study in the areas of commerce, engineering and technology, information and communication technologies, aviation, arts and social sciences, sustainability, digital media and many more." The entire sentence is advertising, and the phrase "many more" is a common phrase used in advertising.
- "The Prahran campus is known as Swinburne’s ‘creative campus’ and is located right in the heart of cosmopolitan Prahran." Most of the sentence is advertising. The terms "right in the heart of" and "cosmopolitan" are types of phrases that advertisers like to use.
I have dealt with the examples I've cited above.
If you reply, please first move the entire conversation to my talk page. If I reply to you, I can do the same.
Cheers! —Unforgettableid (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thank you and apologies
Nullarbor - and the cultural thing - my apology that I just reverted without speaking with you - it was like an OR section - have added the redex trial refs - the other section will have some added refs... thanbks for reminding me about the section sorry about retrospective addition. satusuro 08:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Sexual Morality and the Law
Hi Esperant. If you can, please keep an eye on Sexual Morality and the Law. The unreferenced material you removed back in 2012 was added again in 2013. I've just removed it. Interested in science (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Judith Miller (philosopher) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judith Miller (philosopher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Miller (philosopher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMP EAX (talk) 00:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)