Talk:Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi

Editors of this (and all Wikipedia articles) should talk note of Wikipedia's policies on maintaining a neutral point of view and verifiability. I have removed text for the article that advanced one point of view over others, including the dispute between Muslims and Hindus over the partition of India, and text that celebrates the subject of the article, instead of reporting objectively on him. Ground Zero | t 12:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Also, I have made edits to bring this article in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and WP:REPEATLINK. These edits must not be reverted without discussion. Ground Zero | t 14:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

W ref to the notes above by Ground Zero, this article seems to still be full of many problems and issues-basic ones such as v poor and unreliable references and extremely bad writing which is very confusing ; to a definite slanted/biased POV that seems to project the subject in some sort of 'peacock' style language, as some sort of messiah or do-it-all. Which certainly wasnt the case, historically speaking. I would strongly suggest that this article be drastically cut and pruned and revised, and made succinct and clear and neutral. would especially welcome proper reliable references, not self-published sources or sources closely linked to the subject. Thank you Khani100 (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Khani100