If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
September 2014
It seems that in 2014 Crimean crisis you are reverting too much and discussing too little. This is not what is expected from you per WP:CONSENSUS. Please discuss at the talk page before reverting again, otherwise your account may be blocked from editing. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Russian mod banning me for non russian point of view. Please see 2014 Crimean crisis for reference on the monopoly of russian nicknames adding pro russian bias to the article. In addition, Edit Warring doesn't apply the same way to me since the edits that get left alone are hugely by russian posters showing pro russian views. I bet this humble russian admin has something to do with that. 86.13.221.231 (talk) 19:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To PhilKnight-
That's ridiculous, just take one look at the article. Any other point of view besides the russian one would do some good.
I also, didin't see a dispute except with russian poster whom I believe are too brainwashed by their own government controlled media to even have a rational discussion, that's what happened to the rest of the editors on the article. They gave up trying to reach a consensus, and that's why it's so pro russian.
Thanks for clearing that up and showing that you both have a blind eye for the obvious. I might rewrite the whole article with dicussions in the talk page at another time, but I doubt that will be productive since most of the editors there have no common sense and often turn a blind eye to any kind of information that their own media (such as RT) doesn't promote.
If I don't get banned for irrelavant reasons again ofcourse
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Penn Jillette, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 04:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
