Talk:Bishop Luffa School

I removed some obvious nonsense (at least I hope it was nonsense). The article still needs a tidy up. Much of the writing is WP:POV and the content unverifiable ("The biggest event...", "...most pupils enjoy the school..."). Please provide reliable accessible references for everything. --RobertG ♬ talk 14:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul

I expanded and re-wrote large chunks of the article. I have removed the following texts, pending elaboration and citation:

Taunts' recent decision to remove study leave for year 11 has made some students unhappy, others believe it will enable the teachers to monitor revision and give more direction to it.

Some also criticise Luffa for its bizarre reward policy. Some say that the students who misbehave seem to grab all the attention of the SMT as do the students who excel. Those who toe the line simply fall away into obscurity and are never rewarded.

It also achieves many succeses at the local and county Young enterprise competitions, under the leadership of Mr Blamire.

--Ori.livneh 21:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete

I have added an article about the Multi purpose games area. please do not delete it. However please feel free to improve it. Dean Randall

Dont delete please

I have added an article about the schools proposed development and about the school quiet area, please do not delete these relevant articles. Dean Randall

The information is not notable though. Schools add onto themselves all of the time, and the Bishop Luffa school\\\'s new construction and quiet area are not really that important, unless you go to the school. Ryulong 20:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

understood, i have tried to rewrite the article showing how it will cause destruction to the school, NickTaunt