Talk:Land Acquisition Act 1894
India: Politics Redirect‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
The shortcomings section is biased, implying that it is cumbersome, but doesn't reflect the other side, many of whom criticize the law as allowing seizures too easily. Gacharya 23:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)gacharya
I completely agree. The article is completely biased.
Prasad
Cleanup
I am putting up a cleanup tag. I am not very familiar with the law, so I'll stick to correcting the grammar and formatting the text. Also, the article does not cite references. Please add them up if you know of any. Srikumar (talk) 00:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
NPOV failure
The inferences section suffers from NPOV failure. What does it mean by "inferences" in the first place? Whose inferences? I am not particularly sure about the utility of this section. Srikumar (talk) 00:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed move
Should this be moved to Land Acquisition Act (India)? Singapore and Malaysia have acts with similar names. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Redirect-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- Redirect-Class Indian politics articles
- Mid-importance Indian politics articles
- Redirect-Class Indian politics articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian politics articles
- WikiProject India articles