User talk:Ulabcie

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 9 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Proposed deletion of Reade Baker

The article Reade Baker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

absolutely no evidence of wiki wothiness

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Postcard Cathy (talk) 03:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is ok that you removed prod but since you removed it yet made no changes to the article, it is now up for discussion. So if you want article to stay, I suggest you improve your article and argue why it should remain. Postcard Cathy (talk) 06:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nigerian Women's Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asaba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Entertainment Express Nigeria

Hello Ulabcie,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Entertainment Express Nigeria for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. - Kiwuser (talk) 02:58, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfied?

I hope you are satisfied that my article has now been deleted. I wonder what you will benefit from deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulabcie (talk • contribs) 13:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Ulabcie. I would be satisfied simply by understanding what you are talking about. Postcard Cathy (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Guess you aren't gonna answer. Postcard Cathy (talk) 06:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am just reading your message right now. All I was trying to do was help Wikipedia by creatng articles that was listed as needs. Then you asked for it to be deleted. I was discouraged after that incident. Ulabcie (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]