User talk:Kiwuser

Welcome!

Posts have been omitted as they are in my Archive

I am only human, so I will make mistakes (especially being new here). I will try my best to rectify the situation, and undo any mistakes/damage I may have done

I will clear discussions to my archive at the end of each year

Yes, you made a mistake, because the edits were made as a result of a discussion on the article's talk page

I don't even agree with the edits I made, I just made them to get another editor off my back. 63.155.164.33 (talk) 07:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on your talk page, sorry about that! Kiwuser (talk) 07:53, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's annoying, but he's not harassing me, just being contentious for the sake of being contentious. 63.155.164.33 (talk) 07:55, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you undo my edit in the Brazilian Army article?

You said I was mistaken when I changed the word "airmobile" for "airbone". I still don't understand your point. Besides that, you erased my corrections in the "Main Units" section. I don't agree witht his. =/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sampaio5325 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on your talk page, explaining my reasons, and a major mistake I made in said revert. Kiwuser (talk) 09:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I read your response. It's fine, you didn't mean to undo all of it. No problem. By the way, sorry for misspelling. The correct word is "airborne" indeed. Thank you for bringing my attention to this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.197.230.92 (talk) 02:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undone

I have undone your tag on Dr Mahmoud Kalid Almsafir because it does not fall into CSD A3 as it contains some words. CSD A3 should be used when article is completely blank or contains empty sections. For valid criteria see WP:CSD. If i have made a mistake, let me know.

thanks Night Fury (talk) 09:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD A1 should be used in the above article. If you are using page curation toolbar there is A1 tag, you might not have seen that tag. It is also in Twinkle. I have provide you link above, it will help you lot while tagging aricles for deletion.

thanks Night Fury (talk) 09:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Transit in NOVA

Sure thing. I'll do some searching. Quidster4040 (talk) 16:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suraj Paliwal

I've declined the speedy since there was some context, as I could tell what the article was supposed to be about. You might be able to A7 it, but he does have those awards so there's a good chance it could be declined. Worth a try, though. 07:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

A1

I've seen three articles today that you tagged as WP:CSD#A1 where the tag clearly doesn't apply. Please stop tagging articles if you don't understand how the process works.--Bbb23 (talk) 08:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Award Season

It's fine if you will delete it, but can i have one request. you put it in a wrong year. for example 2014 Philippine award season should be merge to the filipino films of 2013. Could you please transfer it, or should i do it myself? Thanks!

semi-protection

Hi, i want to know what should i do to semi protect a page? I want to semi protect the Nora Aunor biography page. please help, what should i do?

Judy Ann Santos

Hi, I was trying to clean up this biography page because of some vandalism but i accidentally deleted some parts of it. can you please bring it back I edited it 10 mins. ago. Please thank you.

TOTD update

The Tip of the day department has been reinvigorated by a new driving force. Joe Hebda is leading the effort to update the tip library, and maintaining a buffer of tips prepared to go live. The buffer now extends out about 2 months from the current date. The work includes revising tips and replacing obsolete tips with new ones. If you find a spare moment, stop by and let Joe know what you think of his work. And if you have any cool tips on how to get things done faster or better, please share! The Transhumanist 18:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)

Seasons Greetings,

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list.

Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 05:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Löve2D concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Löve2D, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Löve2D

Hello, Kiwuser. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Löve2D".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Kiwuser,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]