User talk:Francescasantamaria

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against spamlinks. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

An IP address posted the same spamlinks yesterday and I unblocked the user after their assurance they would not continue. See User talk:80.36.126.124. They seem to have obtained a user name and now continued with the same spamlinks. This is a breach of trust and block is for 7 days. Tyrenius 20:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Francescasantamaria (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

our additions were not meant to be spam. my colleague here at the gallery was helping me, so it is not the same user with a different username. in any case, the intention is to make interesting artwork images and additional biographical information (including lists of exhibitions artists have had) available to wikipedia users. it is my understanding that this is something that other galleries have done, as well.