Talk:Eneloop

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eneloop article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This reads like a press release

This reads like a press release, including typos. 82.113.99.10 (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Martin Jost of martinJost.eu[reply]

Feel free to elaborate. --TheEcoDude (talk) 01:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All there is to know about eneloops is the difference between the revisions, and I think that info is covered pretty extensively here now. Which information do you expect to find here? Other than that, the 4 typos obviously have been fixed. What a shame, 4 typos. And people actually said that rapture was a hoax... --TheEcoDude (talk) 01:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eneloop Pro vs. Eneloop XX

I think the Eneloop Pro (2,400mAh) is called Double X in Europe and is different from the XX Powered by Eneloop (2,500mAh XX series). But could be confusion between different marketing in different countries. Engadget Eneloop Pro

The %75 retention after one year is when the battery is not used, but sounds here like it can't fully charge after one year of use. I'm not sure if that pertains to the Pro or the XX.Michaelsammler (talk) 00:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eneloops in C or D format

I haven't seen any information about eneloops in C or D format (other than the adapters) aside from in this article, which claims that these formats are available in Japan - however the link is dead. Can someone update this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.12.250.153 (talk) 00:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of the term "Eneloop"

The Wikipedia Manual of Style says that all-lowercase trademarks, such as eneloop, should always be capitalized (i.e. written as Eneloop) when used in Wikipedia. I wonder if someone could please fix the article so that the article matches the Manual of Style and the rest of Wikipedia? Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It now complies with MOS:TM. If someone could double check and make sure I didn't miss any that'd be great. Яehevkor ✉ 19:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: add pronunciation for "Eneloop"

I was not sure how you pronounce Eneloop (een-loop, en-loop or any-loop, etc.)... This would be helpful IMHO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.200.159.60 (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Panasonic lite lifecycle

Everywhere I look i says that rebranded Lite version can be recharged about 3000 times, not 5000. 83.6.200.192 (talk) 13:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The original Panasonic page referenced in citation #9 of the Wikipedia article, which purportedly supports the assertion in the article that Panasonic's eneloop lite can be recharged 5000 times, returns a 404 error message. The archived version of the page on the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (IAWM) [1], however, refutes this assertion, stating clearly:

Rechargeable up to 3000 times
eneloop lite is rechargeable up to 3000 times, which makes it even more economically and environment-friendly. By reducing the amount of materials used, attractive prices have been realized.

Further, the current version of the Panasonic page [2] confirms that the lite version can be recharged 3000 not 5000 times.

1) http://web.archive.org/web/20141207074517/http://www.panasonic-eneloop.eu/fr/produits-eneloop/eneloop-batteries/eneloop-lite.html

2) http://www.panasonic-eneloop.eu/uk/batteries/eneloop-lite/eneloop-lite-aaa-550-mah-2-blisterpack

123.211.46.98 (talk) 05:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]