Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhanzhao

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OccultZone (talk | contribs) at 18:07, 5 March 2015 (update status). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Zhanzhao

Zhanzhao (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
05 March 2015

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


I might be wrong here, but there is too much evidence that cannot be ignored. DanS76 had made his 2nd last edit on 28 December 2014.[1] Today he came to edit Rape in India[2] for restoring the edit of Zhanzhao.[3] Yes it is not enough. But what about both of them commenting/editing different articles and namespaces like Wikipedia:Requests for comment/La goutte de pluie,[4][5] ANI's "Alternative: Put disputed articles on 1RR",[6][7] New Creation Church,[8][9] Deletion review of File:Tin-Pei-Ling-Kate-Spade.jpg [10][11] Deletion of "Death of Wang Yue"[12][13]? These subjects are really different to each other.

They have got over 92% usage of edit summaries. DanS76 had also accepted the submission of an AfC of Zhanzhao.[14] That is too much for someone with only 191 edits and too less for somebody who is editing en.wiki for over 5 years. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 09:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both of the accounts have eyed on Rape in India today and they haven't edited any other article. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 18:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments