User talk:OccultZone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Asterisk with bullets ver.svgOccultZone (talk · contribs · logs · email · block log · global contribs)Asterisk with bullets ver.svg

Waiting for you[edit]

Can you please revisit Template:Did you know nominations/Private Apartments of the Winter Palace? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Thanks for the reminder. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 06:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
We will wait for your return, - for the cabal of the outcasts (feel free to join) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


Please take a look at the article Von Sydow murders, and Ahrensburg Castle. If you find time for it. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Schloss Ahrensburg, needs ce, I only took the lead, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 arbitration proposed decision posted[edit]

Hello. The proposed decision for the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Editing Battle of Chawinda ![edit]

Well dude if you will see the history of Battle of Chawinda , 1 month ago "Mar4d" has edited the chawinda battle and added stupid claim about territory lost!

he added this " Over 4,140 km territory lost " to the casualties2 ( INDIA ) section!

well we all know that battle of chawinda was fought in the Sialkot sector that is in Pakistan. Then how can India lost territory there? He mentioned "Over 4,140 km".

well dude chawinda was a battle and a part of Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 ,

whole worlds knows that Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 was won by India because it held more territory of enemy, took more causality on enemy ..... And so on,

well if you will see the " Assessment of losses" or Neutral Claims in Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 , it was mentioned by almost all the independent sources that India held 1,840km2 land of Pakistan and Pakistan held ~ 540km2 land of India at the end of hostilities.

even Pakistan owns fabricated history doesn't claim about " 4,140 km2 " ,

then how can someone mention imaginary claims on the Much debated Battle of Chawinda , although it was the battle and fought well Inside pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector, so mentioning whole war losses in the battle that doesn't even match with the reality ...... , only a stupid can do this,

Dude, why aren't you are reverting the edit done by that stupid, I am informing you about this because, few dumb Pakistanis like Top Gun are don't letting me editing the chawinda, thanks for your kind attention and I will request you to revert that change done by Mar4d ( 1 Month ago ) ,

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astral Prince (talkcontribs) 14:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others closed[edit]

An arbitration case regarding OccultZone and other editors has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. User:OccultZone is banned indefinitely from English Wikipedia. They may appeal the ban after twelve months, and every six months thereafter.
  2. User:OccultZone is also topic banned from making edits related to a) sexual assault or b) crime on the Indian Subcontinent, both broadly construed.
  3. User:OccultZone is indefinitely limited to operating a single account.

For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC).

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#OccultZone and others

A barnstar for you![edit]

Surreal Barnstar Hires.png The Surreal Barnstar
We already miss you! You are a user who added "special flavor" to our community. Hopefully you will come back online some day... Your contributions will not be forgotten. I wish you well my friend. You are a great Wikipedian Face-grin.svg Cheers, CookieMonster755 (talk) 00:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Swarm, It may seem strange to you, but please see this discussion for more information why I awarded OZ a barnstar. Thank you! CookieMonster755 (talk) 19:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Wow. Okay. Thanks for that. I'll be sure to steer clear of you. Swarm we ♥ our hive 05:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Why would you steer clear of me Swarm? Is it because I know the facts or is it because I am Christian? I don't want to start a bad wiki friendship with you, because you were the one who granted me special permissions... Hopefully we can still be wiki friends, Cheers. Happy editing. CookieMonster755 (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Horses in the United States[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 07:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Impressive numbers and article, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 closed[edit]

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Remedy 1 of the American Politics case is rescinded. In its place, the following is adopted: standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
  2. Ubikwit (talk · contribs) is banned from any page relating to or making any edit about post-1932 politics of the United States, and closely related people, in any namespace. This ban may be appealed no earlier than 18 months after its adoption.
  3. MONGO (talk · contribs) is admonished for adding to the hostility in the topic area.

For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 closed


Tears roll down my eyes, as I write this message. Wikipedia had just lost another proficient editor. Occultzone, life is all about impact and your good faith edit will never be erased from Wikipedia. There are more to life outside Wikipedia and I know you will do better outside Wikipedia. I'm going to miss you. Goodbye Occultzone!!! Wikigyt@lk to M£ 20:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Wow, nice message by Wikicology, since long time I wanted to give some kind of tribute to OZ but today maybe the time to do so. When I was new OZ was my inspiration in editing Wikipedia. He also helped me in some instances and patrolled my some pages. Even my initial signature was inspired by his signature, I just copied his signature and inserted my name. Even my current signature has basic structure of his signature with color change and some modification. We will miss OZ. I hope OZ will have good time in real life. Best luck. Life never stops. --Human3015Send WikiLove  21:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
I have found editor OccultZone to be both at times infuriating in conflict and at other times a warm and helpful human being, who has honestly lent assistance to others when they sought it or gave morale support to the under-dog when others critizised them in what appears to me to be unfair circumstances. OccultZone has been found to have participated in breaking some of Wikipedia's most fundamental policies, something that editor appears to have great knowledge of and who had always sort to uphold. Given that Occultzone has done these things, it is a warning to others that Wikipedia could possibly become beyond an interest and more of an obsession. We all have our point of no return - you have one and I have one, and OccultZone has crossed theirs. I look forward to OccultZone's return to Wikipedia in a year's time, hopefully after long contemplation and with renewed interest and approach. I also look forward to that editor returning under the same name of OccultZone. Regards, William Harristalk • 11:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi OccultZone.  When I first joined Wikipedia a few months ago, the very first message on my talk page was a welcoming message from you.  I don't think I said thank you at the time, but please let me say it now.  I wish you the best, and I hope you'll be back someday.
Richard27182 (talk) 08:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Resilient Barnstar Hires.png The Resilient Barnstar
The Resilient Barnstar is awarded to any editor who learns and improves from criticisms, never letting mistakes impede their growth as an editor.

We miss you still! You were a great Wikipedia editor! I hope that maybe one day you can edit Wikipedia again! Cheers... CookieMonster755 (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Greek mathematicians[edit]

I would like to thank you for expanding the list of Greek mathematicians. A student of mine printed this list and showed to me. I was very proud and I remember you and the hard work you 've been doing. Thanks. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Savvyjack23 (talk) 08:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

The Awakening[edit]

The solstice approaches and there is a New moon - the signs are good. A year has passed - will OccultZone return, rising like a phoenix from the ashes? William Harristalk • 11:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)