User talk:Lotusmediadesign

Welcome!

Hello, Lotusmediadesign, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 15:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Because Wikipedia does not allow any form of spam or other promotion of people, products, companies or other groups (even non-commercial or charitable ones). Wikipedia's use for such purposes will result in the blocking of the account involved. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for our rules about this.

In addition, user accounts are for individuals only, not for companies or groups or other collective editing. Your username should reflect this. Usernames that appear to be promotional (such as those that make reference to a company or product) violate our username policy and are typically blocked to enforce that policy.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message box.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Tell us what new username you want to use. Please make sure that your new username does not violate our username policy and check that it has not already been taken (click here to search).
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If instead you believe that you have been blocked by mistake (i.e., you have not in fact been using Wikipedia for promotional purposes), please write {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message box and replace the text "Your reason here" with the reason why. See also Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information. ···日本穣^? · Talk to Nihonjoe 09:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Audio Impulsion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Audio Impulsion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. John of Reading (talk) 14:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lotusmediadesign (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We at lotusmediadesign would like to remove the page Audio Impulsion immediately. As for being blocked permanently from editing on Wikipedia, I believe that this is a bit much as we try to provide factual data to those who may be interested in finding out more about our clients and subjects related to the entertainment industry. We were not warned of any violations when we were blocked, just blocked. We believe in not using Wikipedia as an advertising platform but as an information source. I do believe that the integrity of Wikipedia is paramount and would not do anything to compromise that. That being said, I request that the ability to edit wikipedia be reinstated to us so that we can contribute to this great source without bias, prejudice or reckless abandon. Thank you, Lotus Media Design

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia does not allow group accounts (see this page). Also, it seems that you have a conflict of interest regarding the AudioImpulsion page. We have suggestions here on how to edit when that is the case. Finally, the Audio Impulsion page has been deleted by another admin. TNXMan 19:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Kimo Kaulani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimo Kaulani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimo Kaulani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 20:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khepera Records

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khepera Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 16:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPI / Block evasion

I think I've figured out your pattern of using multiple sockpuppets and IPsocks to use Wikipedia to promote your partner, Geri King and your family of companies. Note that using multiple accounts, evading an active block and using Wikipedia for promotion are all against policy.

I have opened a formal complaint against you in this Sockpuppet Investigation. The Dissident Aggressor 17:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your gross misconduct here on Wikipedia

Mr. Kimo Kaulani, An additional complaint has been filed against you about your gross misconduct here on Wikipedia. You can view the complaint here. The Dissident Aggressor 18:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RGNP

Please remove all information submitted to wikipedia by me. I do not wish to be included in this publication. Thank you. I think that would be the best course of action. Kimo Kaulani — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotusmediadesign (talk • contribs) 19:00, 21 April 2015‎

We don't do that. Please see Wikipedia:Revocation of our licensing is not permitted. The Dissident Aggressor 19:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to delete the pages then do so. What is the difference if I am agreeing with you to remove the pages so that I don't have to feel insulted by your publication.

For the record, none of the information was a paid piece of promotional material.