Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Glint
Appearance
- In Glint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable for having been published with isbn for ebook, having several expensive music video's made etc. Linking book [[1]], if you need further convincing 5 minutes of google will be more than enough if you put, "chemical brothers in glint" in the search bar & go 3 pages in ... -- IamM1rv (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Observation - This is one of many delete requests submitted in a batch by the submitter. Check April 21st submissions for deletion, very short time span, high number of easily disproved notability submissions ... most likely did not do their due diligence and google per wiki guidelines: Special:Contributions/Lachlan_Foley. Due to this minimal assertions are being used due to "flooding" of the deletion thread. IamM1rv (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)