User talk:Peter238

Archives

Archive 1 (May 2014 - February 2015)
Archive 2 (March 2015)
Archive 3 (April 2015)
Archive 4 (May 2015)

Hello and welcome to my talk page.

Please keep the discussion in one place.
When no more than one month has passed after the last message, I manually archive the discussion - unless, for some reason, I want to keep it.
If you wish to revive a discussion from the archive, you have to do so on this page, as editing archived discussions is against Wikipedia policy.
When reviving an archived discussion, please do not copy-paste the whole of it here (of course, quoting relevant parts is fine.) Instead, just link to it.

R in Dutch

So, I found this thesis on the R in Dutch. I think you might be interested and it has data we can use at Dutch phonology pages etc. Here it is: http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/306415 Gati123 (talk) 21:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one, thanks! — Peter238 (v̥ɪˑzɪʔ mɑˑɪ̯ tˢʰoˑk̚ pʰɛˑɪ̯d̥ʒ̊) 21:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gati123: Next week I'll try to add a complete list of possible realizations of Dutch /r/ to Dutch phonology. I'll use a couple of different sources, including the one you gave me. nl:Uitspraak van de r in het Nederlands features an extremely interesting (and, unfortunately, unsourced) statement: "Er is ook nog een lateraal fricatieve velaire r, waarbij het schurende geluid komt van lucht die langs de zijkant van de tong ontsnapt; deze r begint meestal met een tikje, ook geproduceerd langs de zijkant van de tong." Maybe you'd be able to dig up a Dutch source which talks about it. — Peter238 (v̥ɪˑzɪʔ mɑˑɪ̯ tˢʰoˑk̚ pʰɛˑɪ̯d̥ʒ̊) 20:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'll dig for information and I have already asked the user who added the 'lateraal fricatieve velaire' r if (s)he has a source. If you want any more help, just ask! Gati123 (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got a response from that user: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:Atalanta#lateraal_fricatieve_velaire_r_in_het_Nederlands (at the dutch wikipedia). She hasn't got a source to prove it. Her verification is that she herself has that r. An educated philologist has checked the page and hasn't complained about that r. But as there is no source I think it's better to not use it. I will search for more sources! Hope this helps Gati123 (talk) 18:41, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does, thanks! — Peter238 (v̥ɪˑzɪʔ mɑˑɪ̯ tˢʰoˑk̚ pʰɛˑɪ̯d̥ʒ̊) 19:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again it's been a while (I spent a month in Sweden for work) I read the thesis another time so let me know if you need any help with it Gati123 (talk) 18:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thanks. Peter238 (talk) 12:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

R in Dutch (Canepari & Cerini (2013))

Canepari and Cerini (2013), p. 69 state the following about neutral international Dutch (symbols not in Unicode are here replaced with ?): “Before consonants or pauses, the situation is a bit more complicated: some speakers invariably use [ɾ, ?, ʀ, ʁ, ?], while others produce: [?, ?, ɹ, ?], ie a provelar semi-approximant or approximant (with possible uvularization), featuring lateral contraction and negligible postalveolarization (as in American-English accents).” Such sounds are also described for various of the other Flemish and Netherlandic accents. LiliCharlie (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but AFAIK Canepari's work is not considered a reliable source here, unless it talks about Italian. I myself noticed several errors in his works (like saying that open front [a] is a non-RP realization of the phoneme /æ/, which may have been true 40 years ago, but not now. Nowadays, it is a part of RP - see the last sentence of Received_Pronunciation#Historical_variation). Peter238 (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this is a misunderstanding. In Canepari’s vocoid system the symbol [a] is defined as a central vocoid, which is typical of Jamaicans and others, but definitely not of whatever generation of RP speakers. (Confusingly, Canepari’s symbol for a fully open front vocoid is [æ]). LiliCharlie (talk) 23:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a misunderstanding. The vowel I am referring to is transcribed [a] in IPA, but [ᴀ] in canIPA. Also, don't forget that these vowels are labelled differently in IPA and canIPA:

- The front unrounded vowel [æ] is labelled as near-open front in IPA, but open front in canIPA. According to Canepari, it's the lowest front vowel that you can pronounce.

- The front unrounded vowel [a] (well, [ᴀ] in canIPA) is labelled as open front in IPA, but open near-front in canIPA. That's the vowel I'm talking about. Peter238 (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Peter238. You have new messages at Talk:Swiss Standard German.
Message added 19:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for not undoing my changes without considerations!!! ZH8000 (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... you're welcome, but I don't understand. Is that a sarcasm or what? Peter238 (talk) 19:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General American

Do people use that many socks when they don't get their way? I am frankly astounded at the number of times that fellow has reverted the same edit. Tharthan (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He probably has some kind of mental illness, but that's obviously not an excuse. Peter238 (talk) 12:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]