Talk:Putfile

This article seems like advertising to me. It should be removed or striped down to the core. 07:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)07:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)ColenFace 07:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the paragraph about the Singapore banning controversy since I could not find any reputable sources verifying it. Please do not reinstate it unless you can provide the requisite citations. — Dan | talk 22:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the line "Nor has Putfile barred users of seven other countries that also carried out executions by hanging". Sounds whiny to me. Dodo bird 19:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore ban

File:Putfileban.jpg

Veritifiable proof: Singaporeans cannot enter the website anymore. You will have to assess from a Singapore computer to see so.

Darklord of the Sith Daniel Lim 00:33, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you navigate to the site's root URL (http://www.putfile.com/) and take another screenshot? It would be nice to use to illustrate the article. — Dan | talk 02:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, since you're in Singapore, can you verify that the "goodbye Singapore" message is only visible to Singaporeans? — Dan | talk 02:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First issue: Singaporeans who click on (http://www.putfile.com) will be redirected to the page in the screenshot above.

Second issue: The screenshot on the right is of the message for "Putfile says goodbye to Singapore".

File:Putfilebanonsingaporeans.jpg

Putfile says goodbye to Singapore

Darklord of the Sith Daniel Lim 11:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But now everyone in Singapore can access Putfile again... and the page (Goodbye to us) and the forum topic have been removed. Are they trying to do something funny now? xertnevnI 03:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Somebody added a notability template to the article, which I addressed in the article and then removed. jpez 03:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]