Talk:Polymyxin B
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Polymyxin B article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Polymyxin B.
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
This article really makes it sound as if polymyxin B is some kind of toothpaste or laundry detergent. That's just not the case. It is quite specific for lipopolysaccharide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M palmer45 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
2 comments
Very good article - only two comments 1. "Proteus group" should probably be "the genus Proteus" or a similar phrase. "Proteus group" is rarely used in microbiology. I can find only a couple of instances in the literature of the phrase "Proteus group", none of these are from the 21st Century. 2. Serratia marcescens are almost always resistant to polymyxin B, and this species should be added to the list of polymyxin B resistant Gram-negative organisms. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.6.155 (talk) 01:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Mismatch between chemical formula images and formula in chemical data
Chemical Data C56H100N16O17S indicates the presence of a sulfur atom, which is neither suggested by the structural formula image nor the IUPAC name.