Jump to content

Talk:Edgington v Fitzmaurice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.17.152.168 (talk) at 13:06, 22 July 2015 (If there is no response, then I might fix it myself, I suppose . . . . . .). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLaw Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is an obvious inconsistency between the 'Facts' section and the 'Judgement' section, as regards whether the plaintiff would have bought the bonds if he had know that they carried no security over the defendants assets. 86.17.152.168 (talk) 13:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]