User talk:Cabayi
User:Bazj/arc |
Pmc telecom
Hi Baj.
Pmc are one of the uks biggest telecoms companies. However there is limited citations available.
I want to create a wiki page which is useful and they are on loads of review sites etc, this can give people overall info on them.
I wanted to make it longer but could not do so with lack of references (I think )
any advice would be appreciated Steav88 (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Steav88, The lack of citations is the biggest obstacle. The welcome message on your talk page points you to the five pillars of wikipedia, of which notability is the one facing you. Without independent, reliable sources you're never going to be able to show notability. Review sites (along with their own website, facebook, twitter, and anything else self-published) aren't reliable. Bdaily, the source you used, and the only one I could find for them, looks like it just republishes companies' press releases, which makes it unreliable too.
- Sometimes, no matter how hard you look, some topics just aren't notable. Happy editing Bazj (talk) 07:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Silkywoolmercenary
Hi Bazj,
As I'm sure you know, you marked the page I created, "Edgenuity Inc.," for speedy deletion; and as such, it was deleted. I read through the criteria and understand that the reason for this proposition is because the content seemed to be too "promotional."
Would you be able to help me in identifying certain specifics that caused this to be tagged as such? Was it the particular verbiage used, or rather the content that was being expanded upon (products/services)?
Thanks in advance,
Silkywoolmercenary (talk) 17:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Silkywoolmercenary, I'll assume the version of the article in your sandbox is a copy of the deleted article (it looks familiar, and like you, I can't see the published article any more). A quick glance throws up the following issues:
- ® and ™ marks have no place on Wikipedia
- The sources cited don't meet the requirement to be reliable and independent. Social websites like Google+ and sites that re-publish PR releases don't make the grade.
- WebbAlign Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Partner... so what? WebbAlign doesn't have an article and a google search for it shows the sole piece of notability for them is that they gave an award to Edgenuity.
- "Edgenuity’s published research and efficacy studies can be found here" is purely directing traffic to Edgenuity's website rather than informing the reader about the company.
- "Edgenuity offers..." is promotional text. It's not awful, but it sets a promotional tone.
- The layout with a separate paragraph for each product/service reads more like a sales brochure than an encyclopedic article.
- "Edgenuity works with school districts and third-party research organizations to conduct evaluations that measure the impact of courses across grade levels and student populations. The results of these efficacy studies are used to guide product improvement efforts." - Um, they monitor and improve their products? Doesn't every company that produces stuff?
- Hope that helps, Bazj (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Bazj, this information really will help to draft a better article. Thank you so much for taking the time to explain and help! Silkywoolmercenary (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #170
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- Successful request for oversight rights: Sjoerddebruin
- Events/Blogs/Press
- Wikimedia UK is organizing a Wikidata training session. You can sign up here.
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Talk pages on Wikidata can now be converted to use Flow. You can request migrating your talk page at d:Wikidata:Flow.
- Mix-n-Match got a bunch of new catalogs for you to match up with Wikidata. Currently matching is happening at about 500 items per day. Pretty sweet :)
- @happybirthdayauthors is a new Twitter account posting reading suggestions based on Wikidata data.
- Arbitrary access is rolling out to a large number of wikis over the next two weeks.
- Duplicity can help you match up unlinked Wikipedia articles to a Wikidata item.
- Did you know?
- Development
- Made some small changes to the style of the edit warning and sitelinks so they are easier to notice and understand
- Added error messages for Special:GoToLinkedPage and Special:ItemByTitle so you get a useful message in case no result is found
- The Entity Selector now displays alias in brackets behind label
- The number of entities loaded via the {{#property:…}} parser function and via Lua will be reported in the “Parser profiling data” (which can be found below a page preview or within the Html of a page)
- Prepared for next rounds of arbitrary access rollout
- Investigated growing lag of dispatching of changes to Wikipedia and co. We'll need to investigate further and change things so the lag between an edit on Wikidata and it being send to the Wikipedias and other projects is not too high.
- Added the property ID to Special:ListProperties
- Moved two extensions (Wikidata.org and WikimediaBadges) from Github to Gerrit. More will follow.
- We'd like to drop a database table. Discussion is ongoing.
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- MediaWiki can now hide the signature button when you edit a content page. [1]
- The "Your preferences have been saved" message has changed. You can now see more easily what was saved when you change preferences several times. [2]
- You can now play Ogg video files in some browsers that don't support this format. This solution uses JavaScript and works on desktop browsers only for now. It will work on mobile later. [3]
- You can now use the same tools to edit style in VisualEditor on mobile as in desktop browsers. [4]
- It is now easier to see if there is a JavaScript error in a user or site script. [5]
- JavaScript authors:
- You can no longer use the Sajax library. You can see a list of pages to fix. [6] [7]
- You can no longer use
document.write
on Wikimedia wikis. You can see a list of pages to fix. [8] [9]
- The content translation tool now works better. It is easier to use math, and useless tags are no longer added. [10]
Problems
- More edits have been rejected due to loss of session data lately. This is now fixed. [11]
- Importing a Lua module sometimes didn't work. This is now fixed. [12]
- Text was sometimes lost in the content translation tool. One part of the problem is now fixed. [13]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from August 11. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from August 12. It will be on all Wikipedias from August 13 (calendar).
- UploadWizard is getting a new look. The look of buttons and checkboxes has already changed. This week, UploadWizard gets a new date picker. The other text fields will change soon. [14]
- You can now test VisualEditor on mobile devices of all sizes. [15]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on August 11 at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Some things in the watchlist will get a new look. [16]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services
Bureau Veritas Worldwide and Bureau veritas Consumer Products Services India are two entities with whole different business. I have read about both the companies on internet. Bureau Veritas deals with testing and inspection of all the products whereas Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services India only deals with consumer products. Being a citizen of India , I have done business with BVCPS India and therefore I know there working is different from BV. I have reverted back redirect to " Parent " page because these are not same entities. If being a manufacturer of consumer products why do I look for the page of BV whole. I need a wiki page of BV consumer products division to know which consumer products they test , where their offices are present , where their labs are present and all. I recommend you to please fir understand the businesses or operations of both and then take a step. Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services India need a different page.