Jump to content

Talk:Judd, for the Defense

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 192.158.48.14 (talk) at 11:05, 23 November 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconTelevision Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Tvimage Template:Television needs episode list

Original Research

This article states: "Throughout the course of the two-year run of the show, there were never enough viewers to establish Foreman's claim [that the show appropriated his legal career for commercial purposes], although critics gave it positive reviews. Undoubtedly the skittishness of viewers was a result of the program's dealing with then-taboo (though contemporary) subjects such as homosexuality, blacklisting, and draft dodgers, with open-ended conclusions in many episodes." The first claim appears to be nonsense - what does the success of the show have to do with whether it "stole" details of a lawyer's career for commercial purpose? Be that as it may, both claims appear to be the author's opinion rather than based upon any sources - hence, would appear to violate Wiki policy against original research.