Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Olson (photographer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 15.195.185.84 (talk) at 15:41, 22 February 2016 (Jake Olson (photographer)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jake Olson (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent autobiographical advertisement page created and edited by subject (new user, only contributions are creating and editing this article). Appears to not be notable; references consist mainly of being listed in several "socially influential photographers" lists, blogs and a self-published biography.

Subject of article appears to not have received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of subject; the article appears to have been created as a promotional tool by the subject. Article is supported mainly by self-published sources (not recommended per BLP guidelines).

Subject appears to not be notable, per WP:BIO. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 02:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of article is a narcissistic, colossal douchebag.

Delete him

-I second that motion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.84.236.24 (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Subject of article is a waste of space, uses wikipedia to shame others. Delete.[1]15.195.185.84 (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC) [reply]