Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Js82
Js82
- Js82 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
04 March 2016
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Pinsi281 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Evidence presented by User:Ms Sarah Welch is at this diff (User talk:RegentsPark#Hello). regentspark (comment) 01:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I completely oppose this SPI. Wikipedia cannot operate on the whims and fancies of Sarah Welch. This SPI, opened "on behalf" of Sarah Welch, who has apparently been edit warring on the Sikhism page for months (see the message from earlier today (this diff) on her talk page by an independent editor Deluded Fan) is completely in "bad faith" and has no justification at all. All the evidence being provided is nothing but childish.
I started participating on the Sikhism page last month when I saw some constructive edits from Jujhar Pannu, and wanted to extend my support to those. These were against Sarah Welch's stated position in the past (she edit warred with Jujhar Pannu as well), and now this charge against me to get me banned. This is no grounds for conducting an SPI on me. I hope justice would be served and this SPI be dismissed without any further action. Pinsi281 (talk) 01:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)