Talk:Lionbridge

Comments

Some content removed due to lack of adherence to Wikipedia:Verifiability and/or Wikipedia:Neutrality policies. Jzz3424 (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The content removed by Jzz3424 concerning the case of DerKervorkian was well documented and confirmed by a reliable source. There was no reason to remove it: 1 DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge Technologies, No. 04-cv-01160-LTB-CBS, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4191 (D. Colo. Jan. 26, 2006), *[DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge] The case of the fired union founder was described here:

[Irish Translators and Interpreters Association Bulletin]

The title "union-busting" record could be questioned (IMHO it is appropriate), but not the fact that such an occurrence took place. Castorx (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Interpretation service picketed by trade unions, activists". Metro Eireann. 10 July 2008. Retrieved 19 June 2013. on [[Lionbridge] company page is no longer accessible.

Same for "Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.". Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. Stanford Law School. 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2013. Does any body have alternative links/sources? Clsbasel (talk) 07:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this is link provides more info and is comparable to the previous link [[1]]Clsbasel (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs work

I read this article and looked at the Lionbridge web page. This article seems more like a plug for the companies services than encyclopedic content. It needs major revisions. I question the Neutrality of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.99.50.219 (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]