Talk:Lionbridge

Comments

Some content removed due to lack of adherence to Wikipedia:Verifiability and/or Wikipedia:Neutrality policies. Jzz3424 (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The content removed by Jzz3424 concerning the case of DerKervorkian was well documented and confirmed by a reliable source. There was no reason to remove it: 1 DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge Technologies, No. 04-cv-01160-LTB-CBS, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4191 (D. Colo. Jan. 26, 2006), *[DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge] The case of the fired union founder was described here:

[Irish Translators and Interpreters Association Bulletin]

The title "union-busting" record could be questioned (IMHO it is appropriate), but not the fact that such an occurrence took place. Castorx (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Interpretation service picketed by trade unions, activists". Metro Eireann. 10 July 2008. Retrieved 19 June 2013. on Lionbridge company page is no longer accessible. Update: I added the above ITIA bulleting and found and this archived link at [[Metro Eireann]

Same for "Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.". Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. Stanford Law School. 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2013. Does any body have alternative links/sources? Clsbasel (talk) 07:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Looks like this link provides more info and is comparable to the previous broken link [[Stanford Law]Clsbasel (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs work

I read this article and looked at the Lionbridge web page. This article seems more like a plug for the companies services than encyclopedic content. It needs major revisions. I question the Neutrality of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.99.50.219 (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]