Jump to content

Talk:Sejong Science High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.148.65.71 (talk) at 21:48, 2 April 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconSchools Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconKorea Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tags

Please do not just remove the tags. Attempt to fix the issues first. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 02:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

Removal of tags

Again I ask you, as I have on your user discussion page User talk:24.23.176.171, to please not just remove the tags with no attempt to fix the issue and no explanation as to why you are doing so. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

Continued tag removal

The tags were removed again without explanation and with no attempt to correct the issues. Please refrain from this behavior. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]


Sources and tone

The only source used is the school's official website. The peacock terms and claims in this entry read like an advertisement. I have been unable to get the other editor to respond to my concerns. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

3O Agreed. There are no citations. Article reads like an advertisement. Tags are applicable.Startstop123 (talk) 16:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restored tags

I restored the tags again, but accidentally marked it as a minor edit. Thanks. Wperdue (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]