Talk:Josephson energy
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Josephson effect Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Josephson effect Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
Classification is wrong. Josephson energy has nothing to do with a large scale energy production.
Josephson inductance = kinetic inductance?
[edit]Citation: "The Josephson Inductance is also known as a Kinetic Inductance - the behaviour is derived from the kinetic energy of the charge carriers, not energy in a magnetic field." I, personally, am not sure that this is so.
- Kinetic inductance is related to kinetic energy of the superconducting electrons (Cooper pairs) and should scale . The Josephson inductance does not.
- Also, the kinetic energy of the electrons in the superconducting electrodes is not smaller than in the JJ itself. However, we usually neglect electrode energy as it is much smaller than the one of JJ.
- Finally, Josephson energy is a potential energy....so it suggests that the phase difference is of primary importance, rather than the current . — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwardGoldobin (talk • contribs) 09:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)