Talk:Trachoma

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trachoma article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Trachoma.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine: Translation / Ophthalmology B‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Comments

I have now included a citation regarding the work of Dr Vincent Tabone Maltesedog 13:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the article to more accurately reflect Tabone's role. -AED 22:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for these numbers, they don't seem right

A quick scan of information available online shows a much smaller population to be affected by trachoma. The International Trachoma Initiative lists the number to be at 84 million with the active disease, and over 8 million blind. Unite for Sight puts the number in the same area, with 18%-24% of blindness caused by trachoma, with 7-9 million. Cataracts are listed as the leading cause of blindness. The WHO lists the number to cause 3.6% of visual impairment globally, with cataracts once again listed as the leading cause.

So while it's difficult to actually pin down the exact numbers here, it seems safe to say that 400 million afflicted seems far too large, and that I can find no information suggesting that trachoma is the leading cause of blindness globally.

The only reason I didn't go ahead an make an edit is that the ITI article was unsourced, and medical issues are far from my expertise. I just happened to notice a discrepancy between this page and the blindness one.

Contextclouds 06:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't right, Contextclouds. From my knowledge the WHO estimate is much more likely to be accurate. I'm a retinal neuroscientist, though, not an opthamologist, so if one comes around and cares to settle the discussion (or replace the number), they would probably know better than me. Until then, I'm removing that number and the statement which claims it is the #1 cause of blindness.

C4Diesel 16:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/, trachoma is definitely not the overall leading cause of blindness. Per http://www.who.int/features/2006/trachoma/en/index.html, "Community development and intensified action by WHO’s Global Alliance for the Elimination of Blinding Trachoma by 2020, has reduced the number of people with blinding trachoma. The estimated number of people affected by trachoma has fallen from 360 million people in 1985 to approximately 80 million people today." -AED 06:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are large efforts to try and eridicate the disease. The latest numbers state that "40.6 million people are estimated to be suffering from active trachoma, and 8.2 million are estimated to have trichiasis." Source: Mariotti SP, Pascolini D, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Trachoma: Global magnitude of a preventable cause of blindness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93: 563-568. --130.238.158.168 (talk) 13:55, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

etymology

i think it just means 'roughness' or 'rough growth' -- not 'rough eye'

From the OED:

trachoma:

[mod.L., a. Gr. [my ignorant transliteration: traxoma] roughness (Dioscorides), f. [my ignorant transliteration: traxos] rough.]

oma:

terminal element repr. Gr. -xla, in which x repr. x (or o) in the parent word (usu. a vb.) and -la is a Gr. suffix forming neut. ns., exemplified in Eng. words adopted from the Gr. such as carcinoma, coloboma, derma, diploma, eczema, glaucoma, phyma, plasma, sarcoma, trachoma, and in words on Gr. analogy such as lipoma. In Bot. -oma has usu. been anglicized to -ome. In Med. the examples of sarcoma (17th c. in English) and carcinoma (18th c.) have been taken as types on which to base new names of neoplasms and other localized swellings, -oma (†-ome) being used as a suffix denoting ‘tumour, growth’ (cf. also Gr. Ãcjxla swelling): e.g. fibroma (†fibrome), cementoma, oligodendroglioma, tuberculoma (†tuberculome). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.53.49.104 (talk • contribs) 23:48, May 1, 2007 (UTC)

Lancet

Review doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60836-3 JFW | T@lk 21:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another one: doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62182-0 JFW | T@lk 21:15, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo caption seems incorrect

I do not believe that the photo caption is correct, or that the photo is necessarily cogent to this article. The photo depicts sutures on an eyelid, not "eyelashes" on a "turned in eyelid". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.60.73.126 (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ambiguouswordin

decreasing the number of people infected by treatment with antibiotics.[2]<AB+CAUSinfctn??>infectednumber- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.235.179.170 (talk) 04:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i/THEIRpopultns(discharg

ocular discharge is just accepted as normal. However, further symptoms may include:

   Eye discharge+difOKULA><EYEdisch??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.235.179.170 (talk) 05:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest addition to "History"

Believed to be present in Australian Aborigines in Pleistocene: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2405692 Lisapaloma (talk) 14:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]