User talk:Mann Mann

Archives

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

A section of the Bactria article needs to be addressed.

Recently I was on the talk page on the Bactria article starting a new discussion about the section known as Tokharistan:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bactria

Reason being is because although it says in the last sentence "Later, in the 5th century, it was controlled by the Xionites and the Hephthalites but was reconquered by the Sassanids" There are unfortunately no citations or sources anywhere to support this claim.

See here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bactria#Tokharistan

This is why I believe this must be discussed by the editors of the article. I'm not sure how much have knowledge you have on this, but hopefully you can put your input on this. I linked the discussion for you as I did with Rcsprinter₁₂₃ Kirby (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Medes

Hi You wrote me on Wikipedia:) My reliable source was Daniel 6 from the Hebrew Scriptures YoCuzwaasup (talk) 22:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@YoCuzwaasup: Hi. Please read WP:RELIABLE. Discuss your edits on Talk:Medes. --Wario-Man (talk) 05:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tirgil34

Hi Wario-Man,

Take a look at contributions of banned sock Intelinside13core (talk · contribs). It seems that the long-term abuser has obsessed with you since 2012. 46.221.221.7 (talk) 11:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See this. --Wario-Man (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See 1, 2, 3. Also, I have noticed more socks while I was checking his targeted articles. Thus, the SPI might be a bit late. See this user who restored socks' edits here. The sock account was created in 2012 and re-activated in 2016! I have also noticed plenty of proxies edited the article. 46.221.219.221 (talk) 10:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not helpful to find all possible and suspected accounts by yourself and then try to report all of them. Because admins usually ignore stale accounts. Plus, admins can find all related accounts by checkuser (stale, active, sleeper and new & untouched ones). You should report recent activities and current active accounts in my opinion. --Wario-Man (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No no, you misunderstood me. I am not going to report stale accounts on SPI, of course. I mean, I have also noticed the other suspicious account and proxies that are currently active-That's what I was talking about. By the way, it is also important to detect stale socks and proxies, thereby can report them when they become active again. Remember Egapleicesp case. Cheers, 46.221.215.221 (talk) 06:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Most of the socks that were banned within this year were created when Krakkos was not active on WP. See November case and account creation time of those socks. 46.221.215.221 (talk) 07:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]