User talk:WikiCreativeJuicer

undisclosed alternate accounts may not participate in internal discussions.

From WP:SOCK in the section titled Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts it says: "Editing project space: Undisclosed alternative accounts are not to be used in discussions internal to the project."

Since it is obvious you have experience here it is clear that this is an alternate account. If you wish to participate in banning discussions or other internal project discussions you must do so through your primary account and not your undisclosed alternate account.

Further violation of this policy will result in a block of this account. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 14:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an alternate. I used to edit via IP addresses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiCreativeJuicer (talk • contribs) 18:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be an alternate account which is generally enough to get you blocked for engaging in inappropriate use of an alternate account. Frankly I don't buy your story and my warning stands. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can't prove a negative

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

WikiCreativeJuicer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I blocked?

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Why was I blocked? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Since you have decided to ignored my warning so I am blocking this account.

None of your edits indicate you are here to build an encyclopedia and all of them indicate that you do have an undisclosed history here. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I said I edited under ip addresses before. I created an account to be more helpful. Should I go back to anonymous editing?

When a brand new account shows up and knows all the back areas of the project and is full of opinions on how things should be it is clear they are not a new user. I politely explained to you our expectation regarding undisclosed alternate accounts and you decided to continue to use it inappropriately. We do allow undisclosed alternate accounts, but not in internal discussions.

If you do have a history here as an IP then you should be able to disclose it by linking to one of your posts. If you don't want to do that for privacy reasons then I understand that. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

if that's what you ou want why not ask for that?