User talk:Halbared/Archive 2
![]() |
1 |
I'm sorry for deleting messages
OK, I'm sorry..—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 15:01, 2 September 2006(UTC)
Your Archive
Looks OK to me. Rich Farmbrough, 14:08 2 September 2006 (GMT).
Help for Editing pages
And thanks for giving me advices.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 15:01, 15:10, 2 September 2006(UTC)
You've already given me some advices
I go to my main page and I tried to edit this page but there still opens a link with the title "index". I've opened that index and nothing else happened.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 15:12, 2 September 2006(UTC)
I've solved my problem
I've solved my problem by my own, although thanks for giving me advices—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 16:00, 2 September 2006(UTC)
Kevin Durand
why do you always remove him from that 6' 5.5" (197 cm) page?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 17:05, 2 September 2006(UTC)
- The article is short even for stubb, I offered it up for deletion, but it was a weak keep. And please sign ur msgs!!!(Halbared 16:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
What are msgs???
What are smgs???—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 20:05, 2 September 2006(UTC)
Lieutenant Dol GrennThank you for your helpLieutenant Dol Grenn
Title Changes
The problem is that WWE(WCW and ECW did this as well) is that they use revisionist history to present it the way they want. Ric Flair is officially a 22 time world champion, not 16. PWI is the most trusted source in the wrestling industry, and the members of WP:PW have agreed to use them since they actually keep track of these things accurately. I apologize for calling you a troll, but Inoki should remain there since he did win and lose the title and WWE just chooses not to acknowledge it. TJ Spyke 19:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- There are 13 archives there. If you want to bring the issue up again though, please do. For now though, Inoki should remain there unless there is a consenus to remove him. TJ Spyke 20:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Warning?
I think you ought to have a warning, for posting that i am a suspected sockpuppet. You have guts to post that, you know. May i ask WHO i am supposed to be a sockpuppet of? There's no one. You are just angry with me, for reasons i do not know. STOP posting this now, before i ask someone to block you for falsely reporting sockpuppets! --Cookie 21:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Here ya go.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:67.185.26.89 (Halbared 21:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
I have reason to believe this user is a sockpuppetter, he is an admitted vandal and should be watched.(Halbared 22:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
Who is an admitted vandal? --Cookie 01:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- You wrote it on your talk page.(Halbared 08:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
Lebedev
I was looking through the Mikhail Lebedev page and it seems to be vanity and non-notable to me. First of all, there is hardly any information about him on Google. Then, none of the publications seem to be news-worthy and notable. Finally, the scientist does not have many 1st author publications and seems to be non-important in his field. If you agree with me, can you please help me nominate Mikhail Lebedev for deletion? --GoOdCoNtEnT 08:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Civil & Removing Warnings
DXRAW 09:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I have asked you to cite an behaviour, you haven't. If you can't cite it, there is no need for warnings(Halbared 09:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
- I just did & you removed it.
- By removing warnings from your talkpage. Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point, Also by not Assuming good faith And for future refence Include only verifiable information & No original research. DXRAW 09:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Also, Why dont you re read This. DXRAW 09:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
You have cited a page where that person removed edits as your citation? Where the user admits he is a vandal, and where sockpupptery is proven on another ip? It's not a very good case.(Halbared 09:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
- What about Edge's page, I see when somebody does not agree with you. You accuse them of being a sockpuppet. Care to back up that nice tage on mt talk page with evdience. DXRAW 09:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- I am accusing you of being a sockpuppet because of this action your taking now, you can't show where I have been uncivil, Cuke monster has a history of vandalism and sockpuppetry, and you seem to be following that format, if I am wrong, I am wrong, but it looks possible.(Halbared 09:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
- What about Edge's page, I see when somebody does not agree with you. You accuse them of being a sockpuppet. Care to back up that nice tage on mt talk page with evdience. DXRAW 09:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- I am compiling my evidence now. You still have not shown where I was uncivil, this is making me think you are a sockpuppet, if you are not, then please refrain from causing arguments(Halbared 09:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
- I'm assuming i will get an applogy when you find out that im not a sockpuppet. DXRAW 09:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- I am compiling my evidence now. You still have not shown where I was uncivil, this is making me think you are a sockpuppet, if you are not, then please refrain from causing arguments(Halbared 09:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
[Dont be a dick] DXRAW 09:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- And my apology for all this unecessaary fuss is....where?(Halbared 10:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
Why dont you consider who started this unecessaary fuss. DXRAW 10:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- You want an apology for removing warnings, Disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point, Not including verifiable information & incorectly accusing me of being a sockpuppet. DXRAW 10:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Your actions make it possible, as well as your innacurate accusations of being uncivil. If you want this to end then leave it? Unless you are a sockpuppet and wish for it to continue??(Halbared 12:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
- I have pointed it out more than once but you just brush it off. Also can you make up your mind if im a sockpuppet or not. You seem to be confused about that. DXRAW 12:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Your actions make it possible, as well as your innacurate accusations of being uncivil. If you want this to end then leave it? Unless you are a sockpuppet and wish for it to continue??(Halbared 12:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
Kevin Durand
I've edited his page with more informations. Now, I'm going to put him to the list of famous tall men.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 13:04, 3 September 2006(UTC)
- OK, that's fine with me(Halbared 12:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC))
Sign your posts
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! DXRAW 12:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)