User talk:LibertyUA

August 2016

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the ones you made to Template:Gomel Region and Loyew District, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Stop reverting my changes back to the consensus versions of the nomenclature for Belarusian districts, cites, etc. Wikipedia follows WP:BELARUSIANNAMES. You are engaged in mass changes without discussion with any other editors. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And what about czech and polish? You do not complain. But if it belarusian it's communist and shit and so russian, right? We want democracy and not stupid soviet alphabet for our cities and other geographical names. Get me answer please.

Czech and Polish are written using Latin script. What does that have to do with languages written in Cyrillic? Also, please read WP:CIVIL. Wikipedia is not a WP:BATTLEGROUND, and I'm not interested in waging an edit war. That's not how Wikipedia works. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now is not the Khrushchev era is now 21 century and we have to adapt to the new conditions and nations and alphabets and your Wikipedia is not very progressive in this regard. Wikipedia people is ultra conservative.