User talk:Malik Shabazz
![]() |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Hello. I've revamped the contest page into this, based on the new British model. Long term goal, but I've added entries since the beginning of July to give it some initial life. Please add anything you've done then this then too! I hope it proves productive long term. The contests are still planned, but will be more tools towards increasing bulk output in overall goal. It's a permanent goal now, and open! I would be grateful if you could keep a record of all your articles you do there, as I really think seeing the combined efforts will encourage others to create more content too! Please spread the word to the others, cheers!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Lehi was a terrorist group. You may revert all you want.. but numerous sources from the time of the time of the King David Hotel bombing still exist. I will revert it. And, if you again revert my edit and sources, I will question your purpose on this website.
Also you removed my edit citing "the talk page" ... Let me remind you, as this site states, that Wikipedia is not a forum. It is not a Democracy. Lehi was a terrorist cell/group and there are many contemporary sources that state that, fact.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing
"The bombing has been discussed in literature about the practice and history of terrorism. It has been called one of the most lethal terrorist attacks of the 20th century."
"The timing was also determined by the original intention that the attack should coincide with another, carried out by the Lehi, on government offices at the David Brothers Building."
"The Irgun and Lehi stepped up their campaign after the bombing, committing a series of attacks."
Go alter history there as well, since you're on a roll.
LEHI was a terrorist group. End of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orasis (talk • contribs) 02:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please read WP:LABEL and spare me your righteous indignation. I will continue to undo your edits when they violate Wikipedia policies and guidelines. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 12:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Continue to remove my edits and I will change IP that's all and not TOR, you fucking twit.
You wrote on my Talk page: "Your thoughts about the meaning of "Yom Kippur" and the word atonement are just that -- your thoughts. Unless you can cite reliable sources that support your interpretation" -- So I did that but you still won't comment. -- 04:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purrhaps (talk • contribs)
- You haven't cited a reliable source concerning the etymology of "Yom Kippur". You cited an article in Easton's Bible Dictionary that mentions, in passing, that the covering of the Ark was called the kapporet. There's nothing to discuss. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 12:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal attack complaint against you.
Hi, I have filed a personal attack complaint against you here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Personal attack by user Malik Shabbaz. Feel free to have your word there. It would be so much better for the state of things that you just stayed away from any further escalation of a conflict and behaved politely. -- 37.44.65.39 (talk) 22:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Yom Kippur DR
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Yom_Kippur -- Purrhaps (talk) 02:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)