User talk:Atlantas

bla bla my talk page...

Norse Dwarves

Norse Dwarves v. Dwarf - I think the biggest reasons to keep this article broken out are 1/ It is large enough now to survive as a seperate entry, and can easily grow; 2/ Norse Dwarves are creatures of religious and quasi-historical importance, in contrast to the majority of entries in the Dwarf article. Alex Law 05:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Language creation

Labas! I am creating a constructed language called Ríþenskus. It involves Lithuanian, Icelandic, and minor others. And I was wondering if you could team up with me to create the Lithuanian part. I'm trying to get a native of each language involved in this project.Icelandic Hurricane 21:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naming fix in rankings

Thanks for the heads up. I fixed the language db, and future pages will not have this error. Alfio 22:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LITH

You might be interested in visiting WikiProject Lithuania --Lokyz 21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply about blocking

Hello, thanks for your message about User:87.74.5.175. I'm sorry I haven't been around much to take action on your message. It looks like the user stopped being disruptive (at least for now). It has been a couple of weeks since they last edited. If they go back to their old tricks, please let me know, or look for an administrator who is on-line over at WP:ANI or another such page.

Happy editing! Johntex\^talk 16:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Pontiakas 13:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, why are you asking for User:87.74.5.175 to be blocked now? From what I have seen of his edits of late he has not done any vandalism... Tabercil 23:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look in my user page history there is vandalism by this ip. --Pontiakas 12:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC) From my user page history: [1] and [2]. --Pontiakas 12:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I can see those actions, but they were done over a month ago and he was given a warning at that time [3]. What has he done now that warrants blocking? Tabercil 14:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is the same user who vandalized from diferent ip's put the same stupid pictures (look other vandlisms in history) so it was done not twise. But if you are willing to keep like this user in en Wikipedia :) ..., maybe you just want some more anarchy, I dunno. In lithuanian Wikipedia this user was blocked dozen times, for his religious fanatism and hatred to other users. --Pontiakas 19:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuanian top 1000

Hello Pontiakas,
your request at User_talk:Henrik#Update_of_Top has been answered. See also that top lists for so long, by the way! --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 20:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot.--Pontiakas (talk) 07:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Lithuania–Russia crisis

Hi! I've removed your speedy deletion tag from 2009 Lithuania–Russia crisis, because the article doesn't meet any of the speedy deletion criteria. You can use proposed deletion instead, by adding {{subst:prod|Reason}} at the top of the article (replace Reason with your reasoning why the page should be deleted. Alternatively, you can list the page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Please let me know if you have problems with the procedure and I'll try to help out. Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for help, I am just not used, to bureaucratic mechanism of English Wikipedia ;).--Atlantas (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cultural attacks

Sadly this is not an isolated case. Similar provocations are made all across English Wikipedia. Yet just now there was an attempt to introduce double naming. I am sure that this particular edit was made with a god faith,but renaming Lithuanian towns and persons got a mass scale. And this is due to one simple reason - lack of Lithuania related editors here in EN wiki. Personalty I also suspended my major contributions on EN wiki, due to continues harassing and provocations. M.K. (talk) 09:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Atlantas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]