User talk:Reddytrivikram

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Padmalakshmisx (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This sockpuppetry crap is an extraordinary waste of everybody's time. The standard offer is always a possibility for you, but every time you violate our sockpuppetry policy, particularly with such a callous disregard for everybody's time, and seemingly an attitude that you have a right to edit here, which you do not, you only prolong your status of being unwelcome here and increase the number of users that would balk at any suggestion that you be unblocked, mostly out of spite. I've unblocked sock operators before, but only when I get the sense that they are regretful for the time suck they've become on the community, and only when I believe that they want to change and that they are capable of changing. You've never indicated that you are apologetic, and even after 5 years of editing you keep making inexcusable rookie mistakes.

Like here where you, for some reason, think that mentioning India in the lead is unnecessary (it's necessary) and linking to Telugu cinema instead of the language (you know, the primary topic). Or in the same edit where you summarize critical response without attributing that summary to a specific voice, which is required per MOS:FILM, or describing the film's finances as "decent" as if that subjective terminology has any academic value. (It's also unsourced...) So it shows some completely unearned balls to make this plea, apparently still unaware of how problematic your basic editing is. I genuinely don't know what you expect the community to do about you? Welcome you back? You don't even have the basics down. Very frustrating. You really should meditate about this, because only you have the power to change your experience around here. Any consideration to ever unblock you would require you to really come to grips with your editing behavior, and until then, anything you create will be deleted and anything you add will be revered. Your call, dude. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Reddytrivikram (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello cyphoidbomb - Regarding your accusations of Padmalakshmisx sock puppetry

regarding standard offer - what guarantee you can provide that after giving editing privileges after six months ? some other editor wont accuse me of sockpupptery ?

firstly, please provide your email address, so that I can communicate with you.

Secondly, please direct me wherever I make mistakes in citing an article, I will correct them. I dont have any issues with that, I want to help wikipedia in which ever way possible.

further, you Being a wikipedia administrator from the western part of the world, how do you know the history of Andhra Pradesh in India, and how do you know whether Vangaveeti is a biographical of vangaveeti mohana ranga ? all wikipedia administrators are not subject matter experts right ?

In addition, If mentioning Indian Telugu language film is essential, I will mention, I am an Indian, why would I have a problem in mentioning India film in an article ? If adding references is important I will definitely add upon your direction, provided you give me an opportunity to do so.

There is no meditation required for me, all I want from you is to provide me a username (a username of your choice), and monitor my edits (I am willing to provide identity proof including my home address, real name etc) using your administrator powers, if i do mistakes in citing references, categories, genres.

I am here to help wikipedia free of URL's by using reflinks template, how many users are sincere like me, putting their man hours, and internet expenses to edit wikipedia ? do you know how much data charges I am paying from my pocket to edit wikipedia ? you have no idea how much content I have contributed to wikipedia since 2011.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that this padmalakshmisx is a complete conspiracy of western wikipedia administrators whose aim is to restrict the development of Indian articles. I am far more better than so many other Indian editors, in my editing capabilities.

I have significant content to develop Indian films at cannes film festival ? Is there any editor available to replace my intellectual capability ? This is not the way wikipedia should function, if required ask editors to provide their identity proofs only to the arbitration committee, and further develop a mechanism so that administrators can view a person's IP address, and physical location. Reddytrivikram (talk) 06:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=hello cyphoidbomb - Regarding your accusations of Padmalakshmisx sock puppetry 

regarding standard offer - what guarantee you can provide that after giving editing privileges after six months ? some other editor wont accuse me of sockpupptery ?

firstly, please provide your email address, so that I can communicate with you.

Secondly, please direct me wherever I make mistakes in citing an article, I will correct them. I dont have any issues with that, I want to help wikipedia in which ever way possible.

further, you Being a wikipedia administrator from the western part of the world, how do you know the history of Andhra Pradesh in India, and how do you know whether Vangaveeti is a biographical of vangaveeti mohana ranga ? all wikipedia administrators are not subject matter experts right ?

In addition, If mentioning Indian Telugu language film is essential, I will mention, I am an Indian, why would I have a problem in mentioning India film in an article ? If adding references is important I will definitely add upon your direction, provided you give me an opportunity to do so. 

There is no meditation required for me, all I want from you is to provide me a username (a username of your choice), and monitor my edits (I am willing to provide identity proof including my home address, real name etc) using your administrator powers, if i do mistakes in citing references, categories, genres. 

I am here to help wikipedia free of URL's by using reflinks template, how many users are sincere like me, putting their man hours, and internet expenses to edit wikipedia ? do you know how much data charges I am paying from my pocket to edit wikipedia ? you have no idea how much content I have contributed to wikipedia since 2011.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that this padmalakshmisx is a complete conspiracy of western wikipedia administrators whose aim is to restrict the development of Indian articles. I am far more better than so many other Indian editors, in my editing capabilities.

I have significant content to develop Indian films at cannes film festival ? Is there any editor available to replace my intellectual capability ? This is not the way wikipedia should function, if required ask editors to provide their identity proofs only to the arbitration committee, and further develop a mechanism so that administrators can view a person's IP address, and physical location. [[User:Reddytrivikram|Reddytrivikram]] ([[User talk:Reddytrivikram#top|talk]]) 06:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=hello cyphoidbomb - Regarding your accusations of Padmalakshmisx sock puppetry 

regarding standard offer - what guarantee you can provide that after giving editing privileges after six months ? some other editor wont accuse me of sockpupptery ?

firstly, please provide your email address, so that I can communicate with you.

Secondly, please direct me wherever I make mistakes in citing an article, I will correct them. I dont have any issues with that, I want to help wikipedia in which ever way possible.

further, you Being a wikipedia administrator from the western part of the world, how do you know the history of Andhra Pradesh in India, and how do you know whether Vangaveeti is a biographical of vangaveeti mohana ranga ? all wikipedia administrators are not subject matter experts right ?

In addition, If mentioning Indian Telugu language film is essential, I will mention, I am an Indian, why would I have a problem in mentioning India film in an article ? If adding references is important I will definitely add upon your direction, provided you give me an opportunity to do so. 

There is no meditation required for me, all I want from you is to provide me a username (a username of your choice), and monitor my edits (I am willing to provide identity proof including my home address, real name etc) using your administrator powers, if i do mistakes in citing references, categories, genres. 

I am here to help wikipedia free of URL's by using reflinks template, how many users are sincere like me, putting their man hours, and internet expenses to edit wikipedia ? do you know how much data charges I am paying from my pocket to edit wikipedia ? you have no idea how much content I have contributed to wikipedia since 2011.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that this padmalakshmisx is a complete conspiracy of western wikipedia administrators whose aim is to restrict the development of Indian articles. I am far more better than so many other Indian editors, in my editing capabilities.

I have significant content to develop Indian films at cannes film festival ? Is there any editor available to replace my intellectual capability ? This is not the way wikipedia should function, if required ask editors to provide their identity proofs only to the arbitration committee, and further develop a mechanism so that administrators can view a person's IP address, and physical location. [[User:Reddytrivikram|Reddytrivikram]] ([[User talk:Reddytrivikram#top|talk]]) 06:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=hello cyphoidbomb - Regarding your accusations of Padmalakshmisx sock puppetry 

regarding standard offer - what guarantee you can provide that after giving editing privileges after six months ? some other editor wont accuse me of sockpupptery ?

firstly, please provide your email address, so that I can communicate with you.

Secondly, please direct me wherever I make mistakes in citing an article, I will correct them. I dont have any issues with that, I want to help wikipedia in which ever way possible.

further, you Being a wikipedia administrator from the western part of the world, how do you know the history of Andhra Pradesh in India, and how do you know whether Vangaveeti is a biographical of vangaveeti mohana ranga ? all wikipedia administrators are not subject matter experts right ?

In addition, If mentioning Indian Telugu language film is essential, I will mention, I am an Indian, why would I have a problem in mentioning India film in an article ? If adding references is important I will definitely add upon your direction, provided you give me an opportunity to do so. 

There is no meditation required for me, all I want from you is to provide me a username (a username of your choice), and monitor my edits (I am willing to provide identity proof including my home address, real name etc) using your administrator powers, if i do mistakes in citing references, categories, genres. 

I am here to help wikipedia free of URL's by using reflinks template, how many users are sincere like me, putting their man hours, and internet expenses to edit wikipedia ? do you know how much data charges I am paying from my pocket to edit wikipedia ? you have no idea how much content I have contributed to wikipedia since 2011.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that this padmalakshmisx is a complete conspiracy of western wikipedia administrators whose aim is to restrict the development of Indian articles. I am far more better than so many other Indian editors, in my editing capabilities.

I have significant content to develop Indian films at cannes film festival ? Is there any editor available to replace my intellectual capability ? This is not the way wikipedia should function, if required ask editors to provide their identity proofs only to the arbitration committee, and further develop a mechanism so that administrators can view a person's IP address, and physical location. [[User:Reddytrivikram|Reddytrivikram]] ([[User talk:Reddytrivikram#top|talk]]) 06:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}