Jump to content

User talk:SorryNotSorry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Autanic (talk | contribs) at 15:12, 18 January 2017 (Page_Deletion_Clarification). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi I was creating a page from where I studied. A government school under MHRD and no promotional content. Request to have a look on other Kendriya Vidyalaya Wikipedia webpages like similar content.

Kendriya Vidyalaya is a Central Government school, no donation, all government staff. The content was related to school.

Request to Editor Sir, have a look and provide proper guidelines so that Government funded school, have a Wikipedia page created by students or School authority.

Have a look and hope a positive response

Hi and thank you for your message! Unfortunately, I do not remember much about the deleted article, so I cannot reread it and give you specific pointers on how to improve it. While your school may be "no donation", the way you wrote the article was probably in a promotional tone, leading to me tagging it for speedy deletion (the fact that an administrator deleted it shows that at least one more person agreed with my assessment). If you believe your school meets the Wikipedia notability guidelines at WP:NOTE, you can request for the administrator who deleted the article to restore its contents in your sandbox, where you can improve on it. I suggest that you read WP:SCHOOLS to get an idea of how to write good school articles. Good luck! SorryNotSorry 17:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Hello! I see that you were on a wikibreak and have returned to the project. Welcome back! A lot has changed. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome back! --JustBerry (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
In recognition of your work in consistently performing high quality CSD nominations. AlexEng(TALK) 01:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page_Deletion_Clarification

Hi SorryNotSorry,

I was not writing a piece about a webpage but about Ecommerce Software called Usercart. I placed it in the correct section and it was not blatant advertising. Many Thanks Steve

Hi SorryNotSorry,
      I am writing with reference to the deletion of Bharat Wire Wikipedia page. The article was just meant to enlighten audiences about the start of one of world's largest wire rope manufacturing facilities...Could you please make it active again? I'll make necessary changes to make it more informative    Ganganpati (talk) 07:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, unfortunately, I am not the admin who deleted your page, so I can't retrieve it for you. Perhaps you could contact them instead? Best of luck! SorryNotSorry 09:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Why is that you want G.Radhakrishnan page to be deleted?

Reasons please.

Dottydavid (talk) 11:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, as stated in the BLPPROD I put on the article, "All biographies of living people created after March 2010 must have at least one reference to a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article.". Until you put in at least one reference as required, please do not remove the BLPPROD tag. Thanks! SorryNotSorry 11:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings!

Ho Ho Ho!

You've been visited by the Christmas Trout.

Don't panic! Someone is just wishing you a happy holiday season and a wonderful New Year!

AlexEng(TALK) 05:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Biji-biji Initiative

Hi. I was writing about the history and achievement of a company. How is that considered advertising? Please help me out as I really am still confuse on how not to sound promoting with my first article. Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsaqilamazlan (talkcontribs) 03:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I am not an administrator (nor the one who deleted your article), so I cannot review its contents and tell you why I nominated it for speedy deletion in the first place. Your best bet may be to ask the administrator involved. Good luck! SorryNotSorry 13:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Darius Jonusis

Hello SorryNotSorry,

Why you think the page Darius Jonusis should be deleted?


Regards,

A-Pilotas — Preceding unsigned comment added by A-Pilotas (talkcontribs) 14:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, while I am certainly no expert in racing, as far as I can recall, the language used in the article was very promotional (something such as "best racing driver in Lithuania" if I recall? and several other phrases). I cannot say for sure if Mr Jonusis is in fact Lithuania's greatest racing superstar (since I cannot find reliable English sources on him), but you have to word such claims very carefully to avoid a promotional tone and also provide sufficient in-line citations and references to the claims. Maybe reading WP:YFA will help :) Cheers! SorryNotSorry 14:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for providing your support in my first Wiki Submission. I have been busy revising please don't delete me help me! Thanks

Lori lsillato (talk) 15:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Information icon Hello SorryNotSorry. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Guidesindia. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.Template:Z149 Adam9007 (talk) 16:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swapped out your prod

Hey I swapped out your prod on that ridiculous essay because it was promo (took me a while to see it) but it was promoting some ridiculous website that was linked at the bottom and the username was also the same (technetgr). Hope you don't mind! Also come back to IRC! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Thanks for noticing that! My mind just blanked out by the time I got past the first paragraph and I just PROD-ed it. Glad that terrible essay was removed either way! There was something funky going on with Kiwi IRC last week so I sort of gave up. Since it seems like it has cleared up, will hop by more often :p SorryNotSorry 15:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]