Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Arbitration motion regarding JustBerry
JustBerry (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was unblocked by the Ban Appeals Subcommittee in July 2013 with a one-account restriction. Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, the one-account restriction for JustBerry is rescinded. They are reminded that any alternate accounts and/or bots must adhere to WP:SOCK#LEGIT and WP:BOTPOL.
- Support
- Doug Weller, Drmies, Euryalus, GorillaWarfare, Ks0stm, Mkdw, Newyorkbrad, Opabinia regalis
- Not voting
- Casliber, DGG, DeltaQuad, Keilana, Kirill Lokshin, Callanecc, Kelapstick
For the Arbitration Committee, Mkdw talk 19:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 34#Arbitration motion regarding JustBerry
Arbitration motion regarding Ed Poor 2
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
In remedy 1.1 of the 2006 Ed Poor 2 case, Ed Poor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was placed on probation. Under the terms of the probation, he was banned from two topics in 2008 and 2009. The probation and topic bans under its terms are now rescinded.
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 34#Arbitration motion regarding Ed Poor 2
Arbitration motion regarding GamerGate
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The topic-ban placed on NorthBySouthBaranof in the GamerGate case is terminated. Discretionary sanctions remain authorized to address any user misconduct in the relevant topic-area.
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 34#Arbitration motion regarding GamerGate
Arbitration motion regarding Article titles and capitalization
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
In remedy 4.2 of the 2012 Article titles and capitalisation case, standard discretionary sanctions were authorized
for all pages related to the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy, broadly construed.By way of clarification, the scope of this remedy refers to discussions about the policies and guidelines mentioned, and does not extend to individual move requests, move reviews, article talk pages, or other venues at which individual article names may be discussed. Disruption in those areas should be handled by normal administrative means.
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding Article titles and capitalization
Arbitration motion regarding Jytdog
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The topic ban from "all matters related to COI editing" imposed on Jytdog (talk · contribs) as part of the August 2016 unblock conditions is lifted. However, Jytdog is strongly warned any subsequent incident in which you reveal non-public information about another user will result in an indefinite block or siteban by the Arbitration Committee. To avoid ambiguity, "non-public information" includes (but is not limited to) any information about another user including legal names and pseudonyms, workplace, job title, or contact details, which that user has not disclosed themselves on the English Wikipedia or other WMF project.
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)