Jump to content

Talk:War against war

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Avaiki (talk | contribs) at 00:47, 8 May 2017 (→‎A query | transcendental vs confrontational | advocates of both?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted on 25 March 2012 by reviewer Dalisays (talk · contribs).

A query | transcendental vs confrontational | advocates of both?

. . .

Just a wee query,

The main article was a fascinating introduction to "war on war" themes, thanks to all editors!

It outlines two main approaches, the optimistic transcendental approach, and the more pessimistic confrontational approach.

Query - is there any evidence of advocacy, scholarly or otherwise, advocating for both approaches? Perhaps as a phased approach - confrontation first, to identify the problem; transcendental, secondly, to provide the solution.

I've attempted to find such evidence online, publicly, but I suspect any advocates for a dual, phased approach might only be on record somewhere behind scholastic paywalls, to which I cannot afford access as an independent researcher.

Apologies if this query seems to get too close to the line between discussion of the issue rather than this page itself. But as an outside, non-expert editor, the final quote seems incomplete somehow? As if waiting for a conclusion?

Just some thoughts,

jason

. . .