User talk:Sekyaw

Aj styles

Your a member of the wrestling wiki look at the sources 411mania has not been proven to be reliable MatthewTardiff 01:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC) MatthewTardiff 01:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It says "Other websites (not yet proven)

Use with caution, mainly for uncontroversial claims such as the attendance of the event, as these sites do not have proven fact checking."

Use with caution being the key words, it can be used. It has not been listed as unreliable. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 02:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

After review unfortunately 411 is quoting an unreliable site WrestlingInc per WP:PW/RS. Which now makes this instance unreliable. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 03:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@WarMachineWildThing: Yea, I should've checked the source they got their info from beforehand. Nice job on spotting that. MatthewTardiff, I hope you do understand that 411mania, and other sources on the "other websites" section, can still be viewed as reliable. Sekyaw (talk) 04:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks just contributing the best I can (MatthewTardiff 04:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)) MatthewTardiff 04:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Move of User:Sekyaw/sandbox/2 → The Shadow Side

Hi Sekyaw

To create this as a new article, please just copy/paste your draft into the article, replacing the redirect, rather than moving the page. That way the actual history of the article, including the previous version, is still present in the history. Since you're the only author of the user space draft, there would be no attribution issue with copying and pasting it. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

@Amakuru: Thank you for helping me understand. Doesn't it also make sense to have the history of the sandbox in the actual article as well to show its progression, or is it best to just simply copy/paste the entire draft into the article? Sekyaw (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Personally I usually don't mind about bringing in the history of the article when it was in the sandbox... that's just revisions made in your personal space, and it wasn't part of the real article at that point. But since you want it merged in, I can do that for you.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Finished doing it. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

@Amakuru: Thank you for the help. Sekyaw (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

List of WWE personnel

Hey there. There's a discussion on the WWE personnel talk page that could use more editors weighing in if you'd like to do so. Thanks! Happy End of February! DantODB (talk) 05:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

@DantODB: Wish I got there earlier. Nice to see it sorted out. Thanks for contacting me though :) Sekyaw (talk) 00:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Thoughts??

Thoughts on this Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 22:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@WarMachineWildThing: Not sure. At first glance, the info looks kinda excessive and as if it doesn't even belong in the lead. The additions also have some minor grammar errors. If anything, whatever is new should be sorted into the body and out of the lead. Sekyaw (talk) 23:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Kinda my thoughts hence my revert of it twice now. I also believe the IP that added it is a LTA, no proof yet. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 23:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

The editor pushing the new material at Big Gold Belt is clearly the latest IP sock of LTA User:Mangoeater1000. Same interests in wrestling and finances ('x wrestler earned this', 'x belt cost this'), same habit of using bare URLs as refs, same argumentative attitude. By the way, he's currently editing from unblocked sock User:Bbx118. Keep an eye on NWA World Heavyweight Championship, where I have removed his sock section. Cheers. 172.110.215.185 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)