Talk:Military Assistance Command, Vietnam – Studies and Observations Group

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam – Studies and Observations Group article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Additional information:
/
	This article is currently undergoing an A-Class review.

I' ve merged the Studies and Observations Group to our article here (MARK S. 21:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Comments

Just some general comments to help boost the rating of what appears to be an excellent article.

Add some book/scholorly papers or books
Inline citations will make this article golden for GA or FA status

Besides those, this article looks damn good. --Laserbeamcrossfire 08:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Topics like this really do require exhaustive citation of source material. Kirill Lokshin 15:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Once those are added in large quantities, incidentally, I would recommend a peer review of the article to obtain more detailed feedback.) Kirill Lokshin 15:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment above B-class needs to be done through one of the three formal review processes: either the in-project A-class review, or the wikipedia-wide GA and FA reviews. Carom 16:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos

My admiration to R M Gillespie's efforts here to cover a complex topic. It seems to be excellently researched and documented.

Mark Sublette 07:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette 07:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A-class

Although this article just failed an A-class review, it is vastly improved, and I would suggest nominating it again in short order (there is no restriction on good-faith renominations). Carom 00:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]