Talk:Wet Lubricants

Brands Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pop Culture References = spam?

This section seems questionable to me. I'm challenging it. Brand names generally don't appear on major TV shows unless product placement fees have been paid. So 'Product Placements' seems like a more appropriate title, and a section on Product Placements just doesn't seem encyclopedic to me. Thoughts on deleting this section?--Elvey^(t•c) 20:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

510k Approval

The citation for being a medical device manufacturer should be replaced with a publicly accessible reference rather than the .gov website currently listed. Upon following the citation, the reader is asked for a username and password. There are other ways of showing that the company/brand is FDA approved. Example: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm?ID=K013086. I am not sure of it, but I believe this website shows that the manufacturer, Trigg Laboratories Inc. is FDA 510k approved.