User talk:Manc1234

Archives

• Archived discussions

A page you started (Kim Mitzo Thompson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kim Mitzo Thompson, Manc1234!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your contributions. I have an advice please add Reliable source next to the person's birthdate, because age is a sensitive information must be supported by reliable sources. Thanks for your contributions

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix Let's Talk 07:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:American Financial Resources logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Financial Resources logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Katie^talk 22:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Canyon coal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Canyon coal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Katie^talk 22:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Knights & Lords logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knights & Lords logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Katie^talk 22:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Manc1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please explain nature of block and provide supporting evidence

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please explain nature of block and provide supporting evidence |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please explain nature of block and provide supporting evidence |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please explain nature of block and provide supporting evidence |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Please explain block

Hi there User:KrakatoaKatie, I'm pretty upset about the hours of research that you've just deleted in the past 10 minutes. Would you like to discuss the reasoning behind your actions? I realise that I've posted some less than notable articles at times, but they are all well researched, sourced and neutral. Not only does this waste my time, but it also wastes the time of the other editors who have contributed. Manc1234 (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)